Duh. Read the first few words of the synopsis. It clearly states that this is a MODEL, assuming a flat earth and a perpendicular launch trajectory, etc.
That is, the elements of rotation and curvature of the planet have been factored out of the equation to simplify it because it is just a MODEL.
Where is the edge, you know? Like where you fall off if you were to walk there.. should be like a cliff or something like that.. Show me a picture of it please...
I have downloaded many documents from NASA, Military, Naval, Air force, and even surveyors, and they all say the same thing about the non-rotating flat earth. They know it, but there will always be those who won't believe it even if they read it for themselves. All calculations assume the flat earth and not a curved ball earth. How do you work calculations base on flat earth and come up with calculations for a ball. Just doesn't work that way! It is flat.
Derivation and Definition of a Linear Aircraft Model.
References to Flying over a Flat Nonrotating Earth
P.6 Summary and the Introduction
P.35 Concluding Remarks
P.55 Evaluation of the Derivatives of the Time Derivatives of the State Variables.
When they say based on assumptions, they're talking about assuming a Flat Nonrotating Earth.
P.102 Report Documentation under 16. Abstract
Why would they use Flat Nonrotating Earth instead of Straight and Level Flight if they weren't meaning a Flat Nonrotating Earth?
You can find Document here https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88104main_H-1391.pdf
More soon!
7 Comments
Orangputih
- 4 years ago
Duh. Read the first few words of the synopsis. It clearly states that this is a MODEL, assuming a flat earth and a perpendicular launch trajectory, etc. That is, the elements of rotation and curvature of the planet have been factored out of the equation to simplify it because it is just a MODEL.
1Cobia
- 4 years ago
Where is the edge, you know? Like where you fall off if you were to walk there.. should be like a cliff or something like that.. Show me a picture of it please...
DMan
- 4 years ago
I have downloaded many documents from NASA, Military, Naval, Air force, and even surveyors, and they all say the same thing about the non-rotating flat earth. They know it, but there will always be those who won't believe it even if they read it for themselves. All calculations assume the flat earth and not a curved ball earth. How do you work calculations base on flat earth and come up with calculations for a ball. Just doesn't work that way! It is flat.
Robyn_with_a_Y
- 4 years ago
Can you post a couple links please 😁
DMan
- 4 years ago
Derivation and Definition of a Linear Aircraft Model. References to Flying over a Flat Nonrotating Earth P.6 Summary and the Introduction P.35 Concluding Remarks P.55 Evaluation of the Derivatives of the Time Derivatives of the State Variables. When they say based on assumptions, they're talking about assuming a Flat Nonrotating Earth. P.102 Report Documentation under 16. Abstract Why would they use Flat Nonrotating Earth instead of Straight and Level Flight if they weren't meaning a Flat Nonrotating Earth? You can find Document here https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88104main_H-1391.pdf More soon!
Chandelierious
- 4 years ago
Dumb ass.
Robyn_with_a_Y
- 4 years ago
Put the mirror down 😂