Sign In  
  Sign Up  
  Popular - Categories
  Popular - All Uploads
  Recent - Categories
  Recent - All Uploads
  Random Upload
  Contact NewTube  
About NewTube  
  Support NewTube
-30  
-15  
-5  
-1  
+1  
+5  
+15  
+30  
1719
268
The last National Climate Assessment summary document hid key research done by the scientists who participated in the assessment. It was a propaganda document, not a scientific one.
File Size: 65 MB
Category: Politics
13 Comments
Brian Sutherland
- 4 years ago  
Posted in 2011 by Peter Mungo Jupp. Professor Ian Plimer discusses the need for his new book "how to get expelled from school" Our children are being fed a load of codswallop and used as political pawns. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRXCivj5wr4
parkey107
- 4 years ago  
thanks for speaking the truth from the uk
Zeke
- 4 years ago  
Dr. Gray should’ve shown up at Gore’s climate conference and blew his false climate change theory out of the water in person. He was too much of a professional to fight them with their own tactics. Leftists see a conscience as a weakness in their opposition since they have no such master to answer to so lying, doxing, canceling, intimidation, and smearing are considered fair game by them.
Eriks
- 4 years ago  
So this is why they don't care about chinas pollution, they only care about developed nations. Not only can China not be influenced, they're like an enemy of an enemy and besides, they're already communist. So this isn't about climate change, it's about wealth redistribution.
mtn_biker2
- 4 years ago  
They way they treated your friend as well as Legates is an illustration of how they go about building "scientific consensus." If you're with us, we count you. If you're not with us, you don't count!
Rinker Buck
- 4 years ago  
Great, and revealing, analysis of the lies, distortion, and fear-mongering which is the entrenched bureaucracy of our leadership class.
Dtkehn
- 4 years ago  
State of Fear
rbrunner1
- 4 years ago  
I love these videos Tony. You are right about why they start their graphs at the best possible starting point to make the data look convincing. The burn acreage is an argument that can't be made unfortunately, but you continue to make it over and over. Technology for fighting fires in the last 50-years, is magnitudes better. Therefore, fires burn acreage will easily be far less than earlier in the century. It is like saying long distance calling charges are far less today than they were 50 years ago, therefore people must not be making as many long distance phone calls.
Bandit6
- 4 years ago  
Well they sure did a hell of a job fighting the fires this year didn't they.... with all of their way better fire fighting technology. What Tony points out still holds true because (1) yes they stop more wild fires. (2) they let it happen this year? (3) they say it is the worst EVER! (4) they who spout the fear mongering are full of shit
Rinker Buck
- 4 years ago  
A little tautological on the long-distance analogy.
Tony Heller
- 4 years ago  
The 1910 fires in Idaho and Montana burned up nearly three million acres in about six hours. What technology would have stopped that? Fire fighters protect structures, not stop the spread of fires.
rbrunner1
- 4 years ago  
Hi Tony. I completely agree that forest management really sucks. But in the 1910 fires, they didn't have aircraft with fire retardant. There are even 747 jets that are resourced. There are also much better mobilization of resources, far better equipment (gps, satellite tech, etc), and much more resources. It is true that in the case of the 1910 Idaho/Montana fire was exceptional, but you can't consider that the standard or norm. The biggest problem now is forest fires have become politicized.
rbrunner1
- 4 years ago  
Bandit6. Before fires became politicized because of climate change, fires were much more manageable. This year was exceptional, and it was mostly because the left was out to set the West on fire. It is impossible to keep up with 1000's of fires started by people all over the states.