Total BS. Discussion crowded with lies. Both sides pounding false narratives of human caused CO2 increase causing global warming. Total BS. "Fossil" fuel (abiotic) spokesman saying it isn't catastrophic, while global corporate stakeholders (GCS) spokesman promoting the worst possible scenario out of whole cloth. CO2 is not the "greenhouse" gas. Everything that is in the atmosphere is. See Zaller-Nikolov findings. Solar system surrounded by high energy field. Traveling through 'tube' inside galaxy. Residual energy of prior astronomic events (super nova) in this current space we transit through effects quantum space fields more than CO2 content. History shows CO2 increase follows temperature increase, not other way around. Milankovitch cycles have already told us we are going into glaciation period, not global warming. This promotion of "global warming" lies is for political purpose of giving GCS global hegemony their raison d'état after they have destroyed all sovereignty of nations and eliminated their historic reason (war) for their command and control over us, We the Peoples of the world. GCS are machiavellian borgias, cesares and lucretias. It might be a very good thing for us to figure a way to get along without their transhuman / depopulation agenda.

That was an interesting debate. Of course limited time equals limited content . Having listened to Tony Hieller these past few years has really helped fill in the spaces. Thank you Tony.

I hear the ice sheets comin'. They're underneath my bed. I'll hide beneath my covers, or I might wind up dead. Johnny, Johnny Cash

dont think Texus was a good example to use for dessler. his religeon was trumped by philosophy.

Why does Andrew get a rebuttal when Alex does not? Why is it the climate alarmist get to rebut what the sane person who has critical thinking not get a chance to rebuttable? Lets think a minute to his opening statement. This retard thinks he can change the climate, he thinks that man can control mother nature. I am 6 1/2 minutes in and Andrew is increasing his delusional talking points. Does this retard not know that "I" as a tax payer subsidize this green energy boondoggle? And he thinks that I should also pay for a very expensive electric car (which in the making pollutes the earth irreversibly) and develop a very expensive electrical grid on top of all that. Oh! he does not want to talk about subsidy hahaha! My God Andrew sounds like Creepy Joe Bidden. I would be done except I want to hear Alex first. Just as I thought..... Alex has a sane logical argument.. Again, WHY does the retard get to rebuttal?

This is a GREAT way to present ideas. Thank you Tony!