Interesting point of view!!. Where did you get that from!!? 🤔

Yeh he could!! If he wanted to! He's done it before!!!... But that's censorship isn't it!?? & Tony & the likes are totally against that, aren't they!!?

What the hell are you talking about!!?... Like I have friends in here!!?... Right!!. Well, you are definitely another one that's now crossed off my list!! 😝

Of course! Though it's not new!!!. It's a regulative process!!. Not sure about a new ice age though! 🤔. Consistency, yes!??.. Can you show what Algore & CNN have said!??

Fuckenfeels hey!!... All talk, no action!!! 🙄

Kids and many adults enjoy the hobby of building models. Aircraft of all sorts, ships, buildings, etc. 666 bought a climate model kit and took it home. All that was in the box was a foul smelling vapor, a blindfold and a set of ear plugs. He has been blaming climate "skeptics" ever since.

I think and we!!? 🤔... Yeh I agree!! 😝... Fucken weirdos! 🙄. A bit like that Mikey ho's hey!! 😝

👍

Personally I think you & people like you are the true & only spammers!!!... So what the hell has all of a sudden happened about all that freedom of speech & information that you all been talking about lately!!? 🤔... Oh, yeh I see what you are trying to do!! Or suggest!!!. Hey Matsie boy!!!... Maybe try not reading or commenting on my Posts!??... 🤔... You reckon that might work!!? Or do you have an agenda too!??

Did his mother accidentally drop Mr. 666 on his head when he was a baby? I think it is better to preserve comments from Mr. 666, just so the world can see how disturbed he is.

Didn't effect me!!. As I've always been wrapped up bubble wrap!!! 🤗 😝. 🤔... So what's your excuse!?? 😝

Far too many words for someone who misinterprets -63 Fahrenheit as -17 Celsius (see https://newtube.app/TonyHeller/79y1nc6). Moreover, intelligence can be measured by how many words are needed to convey an argument.

Hey 666. You radicals keep screaming for everybody to trust the science. Science keeps, dare I say it, evolving. But here are a few scientific facts. Back during the Cambrian when CO2 was above 3000 ppm, life flourished. Humankind has evolved to live in the Arctic, in the Sahara, in the rainforest, etc. etc. Every single warming and cooling. In earths history has been natural, including this one. It will also end with a cooling trend, and it may be already happening. You keep screaming that humans are going to become extinct. One day you may grow up and become a reasonable person.

At least I could & can corrected myself!!... Are you like them grammar police that always get around & got nothing better to do then to troll??. Do you think you or your master Tony or any of the 97%er's in here would ever do the same!!. Like would 'any' of you, really do it!!? 🤔... Think hard my new friend!! & Then get back to me!!! 🤗

How much extra co2 are you huffing behind your slave muzzle, like the media controlled traumaton you are? How much more CO2 are you sucking down to celebrate your allegiance to your social engineering handlers? Twice as much? 3 times as much? It’s kind of hypocritical to claims humans can’t handle much more co2 while at the same time advocating masks that effectively triple the mount of co2 inhaled. Consistency in thought isn’t really your thing, though, is it? I’m willing to bet, you are one of those people that actually like wearing your face diaper. You parade it around proudly as if it’s a symbol of your devotional servitude to your masters. I Maybe you even got an embroidered one that says “I love sodomy”. You are definitely making both Soros and Kill Gates proud with your dedication to their depopulation cult. It’s nice of them to give you a prepackaged, ready made identity to adopt into your persona, just in time to avoid your inevitable narcissistic ego collapse. At least for now.

Hey flea!! 🤗... Yeh, I can't believe I've just read one of the dumbest comments I've ever seen!!! 😝. What do you suggest then!!?. We go back to living like Trilobites!??. Shouldn't take long to grow so gill's hey!.... BTW!!! Leprosy is one of the dumbest people I know!! 😝. Let's hope he doesn't catch it hey!

Give who!!?... 🤔

So we all just have to except & be apart of the 97%er's yeh!!?

When benditover realises that Tony's recent enlargement has effected both ends of his spectrum!!. He might be able to have an operation to tighten them up so that shit doesn't dribble out anymore!!!... If beds are available of course!!

Agreed.

Finally!!!. Someone who agrees with me!! 😝

Actually, I've only been spewing it for a couple of decades. It all started when I read an article decades ago about the arctic circle countries all starting to fight in the world courts about who had the right to develop the mineral resources of the arctic ocean. What did the people with money know back then about what the future of the arctic. Fast forward to today, and russia has a fleet of ice breakers, is shipping oil thru the northwest passage and other countries are trying to catch up. But people like you, have your head stuck in the mud, while getting an sunburn on your ass.

No the more you try....even if you do they just vanish, forget and come back later wanting you to prove it again. But the jab will kill up to 30% of them come next flu season, with no doubt more to follow, stupid is about to get wiped off the face of our planet

Here here. I don’t pay any attention to these peoples’ fear mongering but to their actions A very lucrative business, pedaling climate fear

Spreading propaganda, just like a jerk!! 🤗

Makes you feel good ha!!?... If all fails!! I'm sure God will save you!!!

LizardDemon666, ah, you have a resentment towards “god”. No wonder you hate yourself so much that you adopt all the anti life narratives that the commie social engineers are feeding you. Makes sense that that’s why you love sodomy too. The part I still don’t understand though, is why do you always have to be doing it behind a dumpster in an alley? Is that a “ecowarrior” or commie thing that you guys keep a secret?

No!... But I'm sure he's out there, somewhere!! 😝. & I'm sure he will save you too!! 🤗 😝

Kinda not disagreeing with that!!... Population is a problem!!!... 🤔

I can think of one very tangible step you could take to helping solve that problem, 666. But the problem's all those "other" people, isn't it?

AnalEnthusiast666, and there it is. The belief that there are too many people on the planet, the root of your self loathing. No wonder you’re so crippled with deep seated shame that you eagerly put on your slave muzzle, giving you that slight asphyxiation, teasing your subconscious desires to rid the world of your shameful existence. When the state tells you to get in a fema camp, because your just a dirty little planet killer, you will walk right in, head hanging in shame, and close the door on yourself. It all started with what you did to your little sisters gerbil that frightful night. You shouldn’t have done that.

You really do like that anal shit don't cha!! 😝... Hey, you've obviously got plenty of guys to choose from! 😉 🤗

Shamebot666, how much do you hate yourself, traumaton? Just think how much you’re destroying your mother Gaia with your dirty little human CO2 excrements. You put on your hero cape, parading around as if you are the savior of the planet, but deep down inside, the shame festers. The subconscious shame of killing your archetypal mother with your filthy existence. Filthy, shameful , dirty sodomite that tries to compensate for his self loathing with his petty hero larping shenanigans, but we all know that the Shamebot666 excretes that poison gas, CO2, effectively making you a disease of mother Gaia. No wonder you’ve mistakenly and incessantly mined for solace from your orifice expansion rituals with total strangers, seeking redemption for your human filthiness with abusive and self deprecating acts of sodomy. Who old you that you could find reconciliation for your trauma inside a poop chute? I know who told you this. Your “god” told you this. Your god is the Soros controlled media that you’ve slurped like a crack hoe behind a dumpster, desperate for a personality to adopt into your vacant psychology. Instead of developing a personality from personal accomplishments, you took the cheap and dirty route out of desperation. You built your entire personality from Soros and globalist banker provided, ready made persona ornaments. Your entire personality was engineered in a back office at the pentagon decades ago. Your sodomy addiction is just your way of attempting to cope with an inherently vacant moral identity. It’s why you keep coming back here, subconsciously looking for someone to call you out, desperate for the father figure you never had to give you the boundaries you crave. Deep down inside, you know your lust of anal sports are corroding your soul, Sodomy Sodderson.

After &/or during sex, do you dribble from the mouth too!!?

Sodomite666, No. I’m not like you at all. My entire personality isn’t suspended by Soros’ narratives of nihilistic self deprecating faggotry, resulting in the chronic fecal incontinence that plagues your feeble existence. Was it worth it, traumaton? All that shameless coke fueled butt pumping at the jackhammer saloon with your commie larper comrades, blowing out your various orifices night after night, at the cost of uncontrollable leakage and a life long diaper expense? At least you got to parade around in your faggot “save the planet” larper costume at the extinction rebellion death cult rituals, finally giving you the attention your father never gave you, giving you a moments respite from your crippling self loathing of being an incompetent meat sack that it’s only “value” is its capacity as a jiz receptacle. It’s seeping from your ears and you look a bit swollen, comrade.

Hang in there matey!! Hopefully they can cure the leprosy before it effectively fucks your brain even more!

So you are thinking for the future are you!!? 🤔... "If you tell a lie often enough, people will start to believe you" -Tony Heller.

So... Why... Have... You...!... !... ?.... Brain!... ?... ?... 🤔... 😝

Your mindless Orwellian comment vs. 7,000 years of earth history.

You think Tony is conflating weather and climate? Really? Where exactly does Tony conflate weather and climate?

So you are saying the evidence he is presenting is Falls? I think that researchers and journalist were a lot more honest back in the day before the climate agenda took effect.

@notmev notmev, and notsmart. We are not buying what you are selling. Be gone, troll!

@Tony Heller You are a hack. You bring up an isolated event (a day,a month, maybe a single year at most) and say since that event happened in the past in a small geographic area, there is no way that climate change could be causing it now. The difference is the changes happening now are global, are consistent over decades, getting worse in the last decade. But keep spending your time digging up your isolated events with your mindless neanderthal brain.

From the Synthesis: "The projections show that the temperature and precipitation in Longyearbyen will increase towards the end of the century. Under the emission scenario RCP8.5 the median value indicates that the annual temperature will increase by 8.5 °C and the CCLM indicates an increase of 6.5°C; - i.e. the annual mean temperature for Longyearbyen will increase to above 0 °C. The winter temperatures will increase more than the summer temperatures. The median RCP8.5 projection indicates an increase of 40% in the annual precipitation, whereas the CCLM projection indicates an increase of 20%. In addition, the frequency and intensity of heavy rainfall events will increase. The wind simulations for a future climate do not indicate significant changes, either in magnitude or in direction." Could you please elucidate a bit about the models that you were using in your assessment, and how you validated the parameter values? Just curious.

notmev - Didn't listen to the video very closely (or at all), did'ja. And you certainly haven't seen very many Tony Heller videos to make such an absurd post..

Notmev, 1921 was very warm in parts of the United States. It delivered record warmth for south central states. Warmth for Swalbard would not be an "isolated" event. Like other leftists, and their media, you accuse Mr. Heller of exactly what you are doing. Shame! Stop trying to bury climate and weather anomalies of the past to make current times look "disastrous" please. Thank you.

@JacobH I'm not the author of that document, but does chapter 3 help with your questions?

@Outrigger777 actually I've listened to too many tony heller videos thru the years. Even went back and read his crap when he was goddard, before anthony watt thru him out.

@Franklin_Taylor Do you even realize that you proved my point??? "1921 was very warm in parts of the United States". One year and parts of the USA! what happened in 1920, 1922. What happened in other parts of the USA or Canada or Europe for those years. The difference with the recent global climate change is that it is GLOBAL, spanning multiple decades, speeding up in the last decade, no other theories match the existing climate changes, multiple lines of evidence,....

You are the epiphany of "You Can't fix Stupid"

@Bandit6 you still haven't progressed beyond your adolescent attempts at insults. No intelligent remarks, nothing resembling you have any cognitive abilities. To say you were as smart as bandit the dog would be an insult to all dogs.

@Tony Heller I just got what you said about the 7,000 years of earth history. You are even more ignorant than I thought. Are you actually saying that the earth is 7,000 years old?

notmev - "You bring up an isolated event (a day,a month, maybe a single year at most) and say since that event happened in the past in a small geographic area..." You should know this statement of yours is completely false, if you've listened to all the videos you claim. TH documents warm periods that a decade, or decades, or even longer. One small example, a TH history of climate from 1925 to 1937. Climate history, when the CO2 level was 300 ppm, from 1925 to 1937. Just a little preview; 1925 -Worst tornado in US history killed 1,000 people and injured 3,000 in dozens of cities and 3 states. (2018 was the first year in US history where there were no EF-4 or EF-5 tornadoes.) 1927 - Worst floods in US history. Mississippi River was flooded for 6 mos. 100s of thousands of Black homesteaders lost their homes and fled mostly to Northern cities. 1927 - The Red Cross listed 1927 as the worst disaster year in US history, with 111 disasters, including 29 tornadoes, 24 major floods, 23 major fires, and 9 hurricanes. 1927 - 1000 bridges were destroyed in Vermont in record flooding, The Lt Governor drowned! 1927 - 99 degrees was recorded in New York on Oct 2nd. 1934 - One of the hottest year in US history. The drought was WORLD-WIDE! 1935 - Labor Day hurricane with 200 mph winds. 1936 - Hottest summer on record, and coldest winter on record! 1936 - July 7th, 31 cities over 100 degrees. In one week after July 25th 12,000 people were dead from the record heat. 1936 - Flood in Pittsburgh had the downtown area under 10' of water! There was more, this is just an excerpt. And all this and 300 ppm of CO2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EFNlTC2FY0&t=242s

It’s hard to witness your religion shredded by rationale. Who would you be without your doom porn religion? How would you justify your self loathing if you found out that humans were not the evil little planet murderers that you’ve been indoctrinated to believe since you were a wee shnookums?

@Outrigger777 "a TH history of climate from 1925 to 1937. Climate history" Again, that was one part of the US. What was happening around the world at the same time. Can you understand that at all???? Have you read anything about what/why the heat wave and subsequent dust bowl happened, AND why it stopped????

And there's this, from the summer of 2019, by Joel Myers, CEO Accuweather; "Here is a fact rarely, if ever, mentioned: 26 of the 50 states set their all-time high temperature records during the 1930s that still stand (some have since been tied). And an additional 11 state all-time high temperature records were set before 1930 and only two states have all-time record high temperatures that were set in the 21st century (South Dakota and South Carolina)." .....Throwing Cold Water on Extreme Heat Hype... By Dr. Joel N. Myers, AccuWeather Founder and CEO ....... https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-blogs/realimpactofweatherwithdrjoelnmyers/throwing-cold-water-on-extreme-heat-hype/472687

notmev - Again, if you had really listened to TH videos like you claim, you would know that he documents extreme heat and drought that happened around the world in the 1930s, including the Arctic. Not every part of the world, but in many many places all around the world. It was not confined to US by any means.

@Outrigger TH uses data from time series that were never meant for tracking climate trends. He does this with US temps, does it with arctic ice. None of you probably ever go back to the sources of the data and read what it is based on, what it should be used for, AND what it should not be used for. And AGAIN, global climate change is different than what tony pushes in all his videos. Go to this site: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/global/time-series/globe/land_ocean/ytd/12/1880-2020?filter=true&filterType=binomial Change the time spans, change the geographic areas. It contradicts his conclusions. Just try and learn how he lies to you. Put in a little effort.

& Out comes the most loyal & devoted sheepies that the world has ever seen!!! 😝... Nawwwws 🥰... Mindless!! 🤔

@Outrigger777: True, especially Australia and Europe

@notmev: This www.ncdc.noaa.gov PDFstudy wasn't meant to prove AGW, but to inspect this cycle of glacier retreat. Moreover, many graphs have thus low a resolution to make it impossible to appreciate the scale units. And it acknowledges the Little Ice Age, so it has to indirectly acknowledge the medieval warmth period. When the Vikings settled in Greenland, it seems there was a draught period in California too, so this was not just regional.

@TonyHeller666: The true "loyal" sheeples are those that don't respond to arguments other than by vilifications.

@MrRumpelstilzchen100 Try reading what real scientists say. They qualify what they know and don't know. Completely different than deniers like tony who CLAIM to know the "truth". No probabilities, no qualifications, no need for future analysis. They are just brilliant, and can declare it to all. Read https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ipcc_far_wg_I_chapter_07-1.pdf as an example what scientists know AND don't know about the little ice age and the medieval warming period. Or from: https://archive.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg1/070.htm The terms �Little Ice Age� and �Medieval Warm Period� have been used to describe two past climate epochs in Europe and neighbouring regions during roughly the 17th to 19th and 11th to 14th centuries, respectively. The timing, however, of these cold and warm periods has recently been demonstrated to vary geographically over the globe in a considerable way (Bradley and Jones, 1993; Hughes and Diaz, 1994; Crowley and Lowery, 2000). Evidence from mountain glaciers does suggest increased glaciation in a number of widely spread regions outside Europe prior to the 20th century, including Alaska, New Zealand and Patagonia (Grove and Switsur, 1994). However, the timing of maximum glacial advances in these regions differs considerably, suggesting that they may represent largely independent regional climate changes, not a globally-synchronous increased glaciation (see Bradley, 1999). Thus current evidence does not support globally synchronous periods of anomalous cold or warmth over this timeframe, and the conventional terms of �Little Ice Age� and �Medieval Warm Period� appear to have limited utility in describing trends in hemispheric or global mean temperature changes in past centuries. With the more widespread proxy data and multi-proxy reconstructions of temperature change now available, the spatial and temporal character of these putative climate epochs can be reassessed.

Dr. Sebastian Lüning, author of Die kalte Sonne, has compiled over 1,200 studies from around the world on the Medieval Warm Period, showing it was not confined locally to Europe and Greenland.

Michael Schellenberger, award winning environmentalist, today apologized in Forbes Magazine for decades of global warming extremism.. From the article. ...... -Humans are not causing a “sixth mass extinction” -The Amazon is not “the lungs of the world” -Climate change is not making natural disasters worse -Fires have declined 25% around the world since 2003 -The amount of land we use for meat — humankind’s biggest use of land — has declined by an area nearly as large as Alaska -The build-up of wood fuel and more houses near forests, not climate change, explain why there are more, and more dangerous, fires in Australia and California - Carbon emissions have been declining in rich nations for decades and peaked in Britain, Germany, and France in the mid-seventies -Adapting to life below sea level made the Netherlands rich not poor -We produce 25% more food than we need and food surpluses will continue to rise as the world gets hotter -Habitat loss and the direct killing of wild animals are bigger threats to species than climate change -Wood fuel is far worse for people and wildlife than fossil fuels -Preventing future pandemics requires more not less “industrial” agriculture

I grew up listening to climate catastrophe fairy tales that started in the late '60s. None of them came true, but they sure scared the daylights out of everybody. How about this? .... Behold the coming apocalypse as predicted on and around Earth Day, 1970: "Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind." — Harvard biologist George Wald.... "We are in an environmental crisis which threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation." — Washington University biologist Barry Commoner.... "Man must stop pollution and conserve his resources, not merely to enhance existence but to save the race from intolerable deterioration and possible extinction." — New York Times editorial .... "Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make. The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years." — Stanford University biologist Paul Ehrlich .... "Most of the people who are going to die in the greatest cataclysm in the history of man have already been born… [By 1975] some experts feel that food shortages will have escalated the present level of world hunger and starvation into famines of unbelievable proportions. Other experts, more optimistic, think the ultimate food-population collision will not occur until the decade of the 1980s." — Paul Ehrlich .... "It is already too late to avoid mass starvation," — Denis Hayes, Chief organizer for Earth Day .... "Demographers agree almost unanimously on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions…. By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine." — North Texas State University professor Peter Gunter .... "In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution… by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half." — Life magazine ..... "At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it's only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable." — Ecologist Kenneth Watt ..... "Air pollution...is certainly going to take hundreds of thousands of lives in the next few years alone." — Paul Ehrlich .... "By the year 2000, if present trends continue, we will be using up crude oil at such a rate… that there won't be any more crude oil. You'll drive up to the pump and say, ‘Fill 'er up, buddy,' and he'll say, ‘I am very sorry, there isn't any.'" — Ecologist Kenneth Watt.... "[One] theory assumes that the earth's cloud cover will continue to thicken as more dust, fumes, and water vapor are belched into the atmosphere by industrial smokestacks and jet planes. Screened from the sun's heat, the planet will cool, the water vapor will fall and freeze, and a new Ice Age will be born." — Newsweek magazine .... "The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years. If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age." — Kenneth Watt .... Quotes from "Earth Day, Then and Now," by Ronald Bailey, Reason.com. May 1, 2000.

The academic casualty list includes Peter Ridd, Bob Carter, Murry Salby, Bjorn Lomborg, David Legates, Nick Drapela, Pat Michaels, Mitchell Taylor, and now Susan Crockford. Outside academia those expunged from screens include David Bellamy, Johnny Ball, Phillip Vernier. Forced out of institutes were Caleb Rossiter and Lennart Bengtsson. The threat of RICO investigations drove Roger Pielke into a different career. Read “my unhappy life as a climate heretic“. ..... Al Gore sacked Will Happer and William Gray. ... William Gray was a pioneer in Tropical Storm forecasting, but when he told Al Gore he couldn't go along with his global warming ideas, Al had his Federal funding cut off. But his stature as a climate scientist was so high that insurance companies kept funding his work, because they had to have a reasonable idea of what their liability would be during the hurricane season. ........ Others put up with the bullying and stay silent til they retire like Dr Rex Fleming from NOAA or they report anonymously after working for 40 years at the National Weather Service. Sometimes the bullying even follows people home, like Dr Fisher, economist and former ABARE manager who’s house was egged. All he did was model the costs of climate policies. Art Robinson ran for Congress and his three children were targeted at Oregon State Uni. No doubt there are more.

^^^^^^ Reference for my last post.... https://joannenova.com.au/tag/universities/

Impressive list of non climate scientists. Even Dr. Sebastian Lüning has never published a peer-reviewed climate change article. Which is ok for a geologist working for the oil and gas industry. His map purporting to show that the MWP was global is misleading at best. The global map shows different studies and their geographic location. A real analysis would graph the anomalies, the date ranges, and the geographic spread. If he had it would of matched what real climate scientists have found: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003EAEJA.....3382G/abstract https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1401-2 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-019-0400-0 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_large-scale_temperature_reconstructions_of_the_last_2,000_years https://www.nap.edu/resource/11676/Surface_Temps_final.pdf https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ipcc_far_wg_I_chapter_07-1.pdf https://archive.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg1/070.htm https://skepticalscience.com/medieval-warm-period.htm As for the threats to deniers, the difference is that I object to threats like that to deniers and climate scientists. Can you state the same?

https://www.desmogblog.com/joanne-nova

Climatologists are people who conduct basic research on the Earth’s climate system, which involves devising hypotheses, designing experiments, producing models and simulations, gathering data, and publishing papers about their results. But scientific studies are published in public journals so people from diverse backgrounds have access to them in order to critique them. Smart people with technical training are capable of analyzing and criticizing work from other fields. The laws of physics are the same for everybody. Climatologists as well as engineers study and use thermodynamics, EM-radiation, fluid mechanics, organic chemistry, atmospheric science, numerical modeling, finite element analysis, statistics, etc. The disciplines that climate scientists use are not hermetically sealed. And William Gray is head and shoulders above most climate scientists. And nothing about the intimidation of people who won't agree to current dogma?

Apparently, on the articles Tony is discussing, it was warming In the arctic in the 1920's. At those times CO2 levels were really not at a concerning level. They aren't now either.

@Outrigger777: I'd like to add: .. and nothing about why people working for their own public funding should be more trustworthy than experts working for industries in high (and voluntary) demand. And yes, Climatologists are an amalgamation of scientific disciplines, the Climatology was taken care of by geologists and meteorologists before the advent of the ideologization of weather and climate.

@notmev: Interesting, some of your counter arguments. Although I've no time to study all your links now, I'll take a closer look into your argument about regional varying warming periods in the near future. But on the other hand, heat phenomena differ regionally also nowadays, for example it might be hot in Europe when it is cool in the USA, and vice versa. And Tony showed there is no warming trend in the USA in relation to unadjusted data. Also, the reasoning for these adjustments seems to be kept Top Secret.

"advent of the ideologization of weather and climate" It is not idealization, it is specialization. Roy Spencer publishes papers on satellite climate measurements that I've read and will continue to read. He does not publish papers on the ice cores or tree rings. For a fucking reason. He has not specialized in that area! William Gray WAS the preeminent expert on hurricanes. Was. He is not head and shoulders above real climate scientists. Spencer can and does get papers published in peer reviewed journals. Gray only published articles about hurricanes in peer reviewed articles. All his anti anthropogenic climate change went to non peer reviewed places for a reason. Now there are 2 areas of thought on that. Deniers claim a global conspiracy against anyone trying to publish articles claiming anthropogenic climate change doesn't exist. Most scientists will tell you its because these people can't write a good research paper that can pass even a small level of scrutiny.

I was just looking at history of hurricane strikes on the US. This year the alarmists went crazy about all the hurricane strikes on the US. You know, taking a short one year period to "prove" their case about global warming like notmev accuses us of doing. Well, the alarmists weren't even right about a record number of hurricane strikes. There was only 1 major hurricane strike (level 3 or above), with 6 strike total on the US. There were 6 hurricane strikes in 2004 and 2005, and 7 in 1986. But the most interesting part was that there were only 9 hurricane strikes on the US from 2010 to 2019, which is a record low for a decade in US history. The highest number of strikes for a decade occurred in the 1880s with 26 strikes. And there were no major hurricane strikes from 2006-2016, which is also a record. It would appear that increased CO2 is calming hurricanes down, not producing more.

U.N. Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked PETER JAMES SPIELMANN June 29, 1989 UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000. Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ″eco- refugees,′ ′ threatening political chaos, said Noel Brown, director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program, or UNEP. He said governments have a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect before it goes beyond human control. As the warming melts polar icecaps, ocean levels will rise by up to three feet, enough to cover the Maldives and other flat island nations, Brown told The Associated Press in an interview on Wednesday. Coastal regions will be inundated; one-sixth of Bangladesh could be flooded, displacing a fourth of its 90 million people. A fifth of Egypt’s arable land in the Nile Delta would be flooded, cutting off its food supply, according to a joint UNEP and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency study. ″Ecological refugees will become a major concern, and what’s worse is you may find that people can move to drier ground, but the soils and the natural resources may not support life. Africa doesn’t have to worry about land, but would you want to live in the Sahara?″ he said. UNEP estimates it would cost the United States at least $100 billion to protect its east coast alone. Shifting climate patterns would bring back 1930s Dust Bowl conditions to Canadian and U.S. wheatlands, while the Soviet Union could reap bumper crops if it adapts its agriculture in time, according to a study by UNEP and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Excess carbon dioxide is pouring into the atmosphere because of humanity’s use of fossil fuels and burning of rain forests, the study says. The atmosphere is retaining more heat than it radiates, much like a greenhouse. The most conservative scientific estimate that the Earth’s temperature will rise 1 to 7 degrees in the next 30 years, said Brown. The difference may seem slight, he said, but the planet is only 9 degrees warmer now than during the 8,000-year Ice Age that ended 10,000 years ago. Brown said if the warming trend continues, ″the question is will we be able to reverse the process in time? We say that within the next 10 years, given the present loads that the atmosphere has to bear, we have an opportunity to start the stabilizing process.″ He said even the most conservative scientists ″already tell us there’s nothing we can do now to stop a ... change″ of about 3 degrees. ″Anything beyond that, and we have to start thinking about the significant rise of the sea levels ... we can expect more ferocious storms, hurricanes, wind shear, dust erosion.″ He said there is time to act, but there is no time to waste. UNEP is working toward forming a scientific plan of action by the end of 1990, and the adoption of a global climate treaty by 1992. In May, delegates from 103 nations met in Nairobi, Kenya - where UNEP is based - and decided to open negotiations on the treaty next year. Nations will be asked to reduce the use of fossil fuels, cut the emission of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases such as methane and fluorocarbons, and preserve the rain forests. ″We have no clear idea about the ecological minimum of green space that the planet needs to function effectively. What we do know is that we are destroying the tropical rain forest at the rate of 50 acres a minute, about one football field per second,″ said Brown. Each acre of rain forest can store 100 tons of carbon dioxide and reprocess it into oxygen. Brown suggested that compensating Brazil, Indonesia and Kenya for preserving rain forests may be necessary. The European Community istalking about a half-cent levy on each kilowatt- hour of fossil fuels to raise $55 million a year to protect the rain forests, and other direct subsidies may be possible, he said. The treaty could also call for improved energy efficiency, increasing conservation, and for developed nations to transfer technology to Third World nations to help them save energy and cut greenhouse gas emissions, said Brown.

OMFG!!. You all in head! 😝 😳... notmev!! 😝... Try listening to what Tony said & says!!! Like really closely!!... Why not come & pick on my later comment!!? 🤔. You think you are smart, right!??. Well be my guest 🤗... "If you tell a lie often enough, people will believe"- Tony Heller.... So why, why would you try to lie!!. & Deceive!!? 🤔

@MrRumpelstilzchen100 Lets try a simple one. You stated: "Also, the reasoning for these adjustments seems to be kept Top Secret." Before I show links for the methodology and climate deniers who are scientists responses to the adjustments, please please tell me why you said that. Who are you parroting? What blogs or videos?

@777outrigger Not sure if it was you that I already pointed this out to, but nice move the ladder trick. Scientists do not predict US land strikes from hurricanes, you moron. https://www.noaa.gov/media-release/busy-atlantic-hurricane-season-predicted-for-2020 "NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center is forecasting a likely range of 13 to 19 named storms (winds of 39 mph or higher), of which 6 to 10 could become hurricanes (winds of 74 mph or higher), including 3 to 6 major hurricanes (category 3, 4 or 5; with winds of 111 mph or higher). NOAA provides these ranges with a 70% confidence. " What actually happened:"The season featured a total of 31 (sub)tropical cyclones, all but one of which became a named storm. Of the 30 named storms, 13 developed into hurricanes, and six further intensified into major hurricanes"

@notmev: What “parroting”? The reasoning for these adjustments hasn’t reached the broad public, including me. Period. And beyond that, anyone who insults others as “deniers” alleges to represent the absolute truth, beyond any debate. Science, on the other hand, is discourse, and democracy is that, too. The depravity of contemporary policy lies in the rule of a secluded class that doesn’t feel obligated anymore to justify their funding by way of open debate.

@notmev: I want to supplement the excellent reportings of Outrigger777 by a question to you, our “Climate Control “and rationing fan: Why do your “truthers” never make the radiative force already in place a topic. At most, 50 % of infrared absorbed by greenhouse gases can be emitted backwards to earth. Honest believers in a greenhouse emergency would assert something like 40 % are already radiated backwards in the CO2 window, and that we would need to keep the remaining 10 % open. Instead, radiation spectra form satellites are kept under a blanket.

@notmev: Outrigger777 wasn't posting about predictions, but about the hurricane history of the US up to 2016. Get your facts straight before insulting others of doing your own sins!

"Moreover, intelligence can be measured by how many words are needed to convey an argument". Where have I heard that one before!!? 🤔.... "And beyond that, anyone who insults others as “deniers” alleges to represent the absolute truth, beyond any debate. Science, on the other hand, is discourse, and democracy is that, too. The depravity of contemporary policy lies in the rule of a secluded class that doesn’t feel obligated anymore to justify their funding by way of open debate"... ⬅️ Parroting!! 😝 🤗.... "The reasoning for these adjustments hasn’t reached the broad public, including me. Period". Really!!? 🤔.... There is so much information & shit that doesn't 'just' automatically reach the public!. So should we just take advantage of that & make shit up to suit our own agendas because it's easier!!? Knowing that it's harder to find the true facts!?? Knowing that most people won't even be bothered to look for the truths because it's so much easier to just listen to those that sound legitimate!!?... 🤔.... So. Do you understand what this man says at all!??. https://youtu.be/y1MZ8U8C9c8

@Outrigger777 you stated "It would appear that increased CO2 is calming hurricanes down, not producing more." Nowhere do any scientists predict hurricane strikes as a result of anthropogenic climate change. What the science predicts is that the number of hurricanes in the atlantic basin should stay about the same. But, because of a warming of oceans surface temperatures the probabilities of a hurricane increasing to a category 3,4,or5 is greater. Therefore there should be a shift to a higher number of larger storms and a shift to storms that rapidly increase. NO ONE says anything about increased hurricane landing due to climate change.

@MrRumpelstilzchen100 There is a reason I said "parroting". You said "Also, the reasoning for these adjustments seems to be kept Top Secret." I did one simple google search and came up with multiple articles by climate change alarmists and denialists agreeing with the rational and methods for the temperature reconstructions AND explaining them. My god, are you waiting for a scientist to come visit you at your home to help you understand???? Have you ever read even a section of an IPPC report? Have you ever looked at the data sources that tony refers to (like MASIE or USHCN) and that he loves to show. If you did you would understand what they should be used for, what they shouldn't be used for, and why.

Not what I've been reading. Yes, some climate alarmists have backed away from predicting more hurricanes due to global warming, even though you wouldn't know from the alarmist press, and an increase in intensity of hurricanes, but that hasn't happened either. 6 hurricane strikes on the US in 2020, 5 hurricanes under Level 3.

So are hurricanes actually becoming worse? Of the ten deadliest Pacific cyclones, nine occurred with CO2 below 350 PPM. Two of the ten deadliest occurred in 1881. The third deadliest occurred in 1780, and killed 100,000 people.

The deadliest Atlantic hurricane also occurred in 1780. Of the ten deadliest Atlantic hurricanes, nine occurred with CO2 below 350 PPM, and three occurred during the Revolutionary War.

@notmev: Oh, another “ladder trick”! I wasn’t writing about “the rational and methods for the temperature reconstructions”, as you’re trying to insinuate, BUT about the rational for changing of past temperature record. Two kettles of fish. And my other point (lately) was that “greenhouse” radiation back to earth cannot exceed 50 % and satellite measurements (graphs) are withheld from the public so there is no public awareness about how far or near we are from that maximum, instead Greta is placed front and center.

@TonyHeller666: None of the specifics we discuss here is answered by your link to https://youtu.be/y1MZ8U8C9c8, it’s all about political decision making based on censoring, mobbing, displacing/firing critics, “buying” scientific publication platforms through government influence. However, we learn there from approx. 01:42 something truly remarkable: President Lincoln signed into law the National Academy of Sciences in 19[!]63. Wow! And what’s more, this guy in the CNN interview doesn’t seem to bother if 50 inches of rain in Houston happened already in times of lower CO2 (hint: that’s similar to the “weather vs climate” thing).

@TonyHeller666: Correction: "... signed into law the National Academy of Sciences ACT in 19[!]63. Wow! ..."

@notmev: To be more specific, the public, which hasn’t all the time of the day to research like government funded scientists have, would surely appreciate to be informed summarily about what method changes necessitated which modifications of historic data, and if scientist did hereby properly consider the metropolitan warming up of the micro climate as a result of more cars, more energy consumption, more sealed ground, but instead Greta is placed front and center by media fostered (therefore dependent) by the government.

@Mrrumpleskin & friends!!... Yeh, it is quite obvious that everyone else has pointed out that slip of the tongue out before!!. Yes, about the 100 year thing!!... To be honest it's like! Wow!! So you were actually watching it hey!! 😝... 😳. But obviously did not understand it, hey!!!. Especially within the whole correlation, to the whole fucken discussion!!. Or, was it just trying to change the subject & discussion!!? 🤔. Some people seem to be really good at that shit!!. Some people also seem to be really good at backing up there mate's, as kinda like the stand over man!!?... You remember back in the school days yeh!!?. You are not doing that though are you!??... Ok so should we now get back to subject!!... How does one categorise the most deadly!!? As pointed out buy your bestest friend!??. Or should we just wait until he answers that question himself!!?. & Then, have you to back him up!! 😝.. Cause it's really like. Wow man!! It seem like 1780 & 1881 was pretty bad years hey!!!. Then we go on to suggest 2020!?? 🤔... I'm not suggesting cherry picking, parroting or anything like that! Just want to understand why we come to that conclusion!!?... But just remember to keep your answer short!! Otherwise no fuckers will believe you!!!

Bottom line.. I've never seen a catastrophic prediction about the climate or the environment come true. I've been hearing these terrifying predictions, some of which I catalogued above, since the early '70s. To revisit these older predictions looks down right comical today.

You obviously been watching to much media then hey!!? 🤔... I spose you believe all that propaganda bullshit that Tony, the likes & the media spreads around about AOC!??... So you going to wait, until it's too late, to finally see!!?... How old are you???... Obviously there are no signs of global warming at all!!!. Right!!? 🤔

Sorry I should say!!... Man made global warming!!!

Bottom line!!?... I love how you changed the subject!!!... You want to get back on subject again now!??

Reposted for your reading pleasure. Love how you ignore the subject.I grew up listening to climate catastrophe fairy tales that started in the late '60s. ..... None of them came true, but they sure scared the daylights out of everybody. How about this? .... Behold the coming apocalypse as predicted on and around Earth Day, 1970: "Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind." — Harvard biologist George Wald.... "We are in an environmental crisis which threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation." — Washington University biologist Barry Commoner.... "Man must stop pollution and conserve his resources, not merely to enhance existence but to save the race from intolerable deterioration and possible extinction." — New York Times editorial .... "Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make. The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years." — Stanford University biologist Paul Ehrlich .... "Most of the people who are going to die in the greatest cataclysm in the history of man have already been born… [By 1975] some experts feel that food shortages will have escalated the present level of world hunger and starvation into famines of unbelievable proportions. Other experts, more optimistic, think the ultimate food-population collision will not occur until the decade of the 1980s." — Paul Ehrlich .... "It is already too late to avoid mass starvation," — Denis Hayes, Chief organizer for Earth Day .... "Demographers agree almost unanimously on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions…. By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine." — North Texas State University professor Peter Gunther ... "In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution… by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half." — Life magazine ..... "At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it's only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable." — Ecologist Kenneth Watt ..... "Air pollution...is certainly going to take hundreds of thousands of lives in the next few years alone." — Paul Ehrlich .... "By the year 2000, if present trends continue, we will be using up crude oil at such a rate… that there won't be any more crude oil. You'll drive up to the pump and say, ‘Fill 'er up, buddy,' and he'll say, ‘I am very sorry, there isn't any.'" — Ecologist Kenneth Watt.... "[One] theory assumes that the earth's cloud cover will continue to thicken as more dust, fumes, and water vapor are belched into the atmosphere by industrial smokestacks and jet planes. Screened from the sun's heat, the planet will cool, the water vapor will fall and freeze, and a new Ice Age will be born." — Newsweek magazine .... "The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years. If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age." — Kenneth Watt .... Quotes from "Earth Day, Then and Now," by Ronald Bailey, Reason.com. May 1, 2000.

Exactly what I was talking about!!! 🙄... Though what you must remember!! Is that some sciences fiction story's & movie's do come true! 🤔. But did you enjoy them!!? Did it capture your attention!??.. You must also remember!! That certain things would have or did come true & certainly could have or would have been worse today if it wasn't for certain things that were done to prevent those certain things from happening or continuing to happen!! 🤔🤔... Are you still with me!!? 😝. Yeh, I fucken highly doubt it!!! 🙄... So here's for you, is some reading!! That has everything to do with what is really going on! That is If you listen to the real science & not the Tony & the likes science!!!... https://www.usgs.gov/data-tools/area-named-glaciers-glacier-national-park-gnp-and-flathead-national-forest-fnf-including ... Care to comment!?? As it also has every much everything to do with this & this Tony video!!... Look forward to continuing our conversation!!!

Fucken pussy's!!. Both of you!!!. Just another good tactic hey!!. Ignore! 🤗... Tony is also, so fucken great at that!! Right!?? 🤔... As well as censoring!!!. He's such a fucken hypocritical fuckwit, yes, is all he is!!!!!! 👹... You guys fitting in that category!?? 🤔

More ice age predictions https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6eswiI3KLc&t=34s

Seeing is believing!!?... 🤔... https://youtu.be/D99qI42KGB0