I suppose to somebody ignorant of basic science, any erudite exposition must sound like 'blah, blah, blah'.

After billions have been squandered on 'renewables', with coal fired power stations shut down, by the Western democracies she is lambasting, this idiot claims nothing has been done. Plenty has been done but it has no effect, largely because the crisis is a myth, and the Western democracies would not be not the prime culprits, even if it did exist. The last thing a rabble-rouser needs is facts.

Lots of solid ideas for fixing things there, eh?

Sounds like she wants us to have a world war with China, India and Russia, since they are the three countries who are the biggest emitters and don't give a shit. Which will end with at least Russia launching their nuclear weapons, and the world sinking into a nuclear winter, while will solve Greta's problems. Someone should tell her, "we are screwed, live it up before the world ends again".

Maybe should pay for all of this bullshit. Where is her money to give to the poor people of the world? Those people have better lives because of fossil fuels. Does this mean she wants to murder the children?