NewTube

NewTube

Sign In

-30  

-15  

-5  

-1  

+1  

+5  

+15  

+30  




Tony HellerPLUS

1719

268

What Really Drives The Climate?

  - 11:35

The belief that carbon dioxide controls earth's temperature is a superstition which has no basis in science. A civilization which bases policy on superstition is doomed to failure.


4

0

0

0

20

Share on TwitterShare on Twitter


3,940 Views

Uploaded 4 years ago  

February 24th 2021  

File Size: 126 MB

Category: Politics







53 Comments

SilentSun

- 4 years ago  

Great video!

TonyHeller666No_5

- 4 years ago  

Which bit do you like the best!!? 😝

TonyHeller666No_4

- 4 years ago  

Everyone denies the facts hey!!!... 🤔... If you tell a lie big enough & repeat it often enough, it becomes the truth!!. Then the sheepies will start to believe & follow!!! 🤗

willford

- 4 years ago  

MORON TROLL DICKHEAD 666

Geraldkaupp

- 4 years ago  

Another reason to put a log on the fire.Thanks Toto,Kyrie and Tony!

CameronLJS

- 4 years ago  

Waaaaaay too much truth for some apparently Tony!!! One day maybe????

ePostings

- 4 years ago  

In September 1991 "Ötzi" was found in the alps between Austria and Italy. Ötzi lived between 3400 and 3100 BC and was frozen in a glacier. That glacier must have been there in the Middle ages too or Ötzi's remains would have been gone. Several stone age people have been found in other glaciers. Maybe the US scientists should have a chat with the archaeologists? 😊

Outrigger

- 4 years ago  

Anyone who says they can tell you what the climate will be in 20, 30, 50 yrs is a fool. Same for anyone who says CO2 is a primary controller of Earth's temp. The Earth's atmosphere is very complex and a little humility from climate scientists would be appreciated.

ePostings

- 4 years ago  

The US "scientists" behave as if the rest of the world don't have any science at all. I wonder when they will split? The international associations can't go on cooperating with the USA and their fraud.

notmev

- 4 years ago  

Also from huffpost concerning the 49 astronauts and scientists: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nasa-climate-change-denier-stunts_n_1424492 "When former NASA administrators, astronauts and engineers released a letter earlier this week attacking the science of climate change, its veneer of legitimacy kicked off a media blitz. Yet none of the letter’s 49 signatories are climate scientists, and with more than 18,000 people currently working for NASA, to say nothing of the tens of thousands more who are retired, the letter seems more than anything like an empty publicity stunt, and one for which there’s considerable precedent."

Bandit6

- 4 years ago  

You have de-legitimized yourself. You always do

notmev

- 4 years ago  

At around 4 minutes into this video tony claims he knows what nasa says about the temperature/climate association going back 500,000 years. You can read what nasa says here: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/Paleoclimatology_Evidence/paleoclimatology_evidence_2.php

notmev

- 4 years ago  

I wonder what life was like 540 million years ago when CO2 levels were at their highest:"The known Cambrian biota was restricted to marine environments. At least 11 extant animal phyla (Annelida, Arthropoda, Brachiopoda, Chordata, Ctenophora, Echinodermata, Hemichordata, Mollusca, Onychophora [velvet worms], Porifera, and Priapulida), including most of those with a fossil record, first appear in Cambrian rocks. Most of these rapidly diversified as they seemingly adapted to numerous unfilled ecological niches. Another five phyla (Nemertea, Phoronida, Platyhelminthes, Pogonophora, and Sipuncula) may also trace their origin back to the Cambrian fossils, though questions still remain about them. The only extant animal phylum with a good fossil record that is not known from Cambrian rocks are the Bryozoa (moss animals), which first appear in rocks of Early Ordovician age. A summary of the principal biotic groups of the Cambrian is given below." https://www.britannica.com/science/Cambrian-Period/Paleoclimate#ref69829 Just a bit different than today, but what the hell.

notmev

- 4 years ago  

From the same article about actic being ice free 6000-7000 years ago: "However, the scientists are very careful about drawing parallels with the present-day trend in the Arctic Ocean where the cover of sea ice seems to be decreasing. "Changes that took place 6000-7000 years ago were controlled by other climatic forces than those which seem to dominate today,” Astrid Lyså believes." Again, Tony leaves out information from the same places he quotes to push his BELIEFS.

notmev

- 4 years ago  

STOP pushing that schematic (not graph) of Medieval warm period. This schematic is originally from Hubert Lamb, 1988, of CENTRAL ENGLAND. Tony knows this, but keeps lying to you. If you care about the truth read https://www.desmogblog.com/directory/vocabulary/697 https://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/FAR.pages_.pdf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubert_Lamb#Medieval_warm_epoch https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Description_of_the_Medieval_Warm_Period_and_Little_Ice_Age_in_IPCC_reports#1990_report_(FAR) https://www.google.com/books/edition/Weather_Climate_and_Human_Affairs_Routle/vtI2RbNBsisC?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover How could the Holocene maximum been warm without high levels of CO2? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_climatic_optimum#Milankovitch_cycles Why doesn't tony tell you any of this?

King_Miura

- 4 years ago  

Tony, please check out this site if you have not already seen it. https://plateclimatology.com Also, a graph going back further in time for the North Atlantic Oscillation would be helpful.

Tom Noyb

- 4 years ago  

Mmmmn... Ice-data. Yum. ++ Why does the ice-data show temperatures stable and flat for the past eight-thousand-years, just when the Bible records man beginning to burn coal? CO2 goes through the roof, but temperatures hold` steady within ±2º? +++ ps When ice data was first posted, Greenland data swung 60°C and Antarctic data swung 40°C. They changed ice-data scaling since then.

zyxzevn

- 4 years ago  

Solar Particle Forcing. The changes in the solar wind determine heating of the atmosphere together with the solar radiation output. SuspiciousObservers YT channel has listed some peer-reviewed papers about that. The heat and density of the solar wind changes enormously depending on the solar activity. These changes are huge and waves can change global temperatures 4 degrees C, for weeks. There is also more changes in the solar radiation on higher frequencies that transfer energy to the higher atmosphere in far more variations than the just the visible frequencies. The solar wind and the electromagnetic activity is also driving the jet-streams, cloud formations, hurricanes, some lightning storms. Etc. That is why we see these events in sync with solar activities. Just see how the weather reacts to a solar storm. Or check out what happens when a solar flare with 10x the size of the earth, hits the earth.

TonyHeller666No_4

- 4 years ago  

But the sun god isn't very angry at the moment!! He seems to get very angry & then calms down every ten years or so!... So what's your point!!? 😝. Like hasn't that always happened... 🤔

TonyHeller666No_4

- 4 years ago  

Censoring me again Tony!!? 🤔. Well here we go again then!!! 🙄........ Fuck you, you tripping dog!!!. I knew you would censor & delete me & this post!!. Freedom of speech hey!!!? 👹. Great to see you live by your words right!!! 🤷... So here we go again!!!!!. Good thing I remembered what I said hey!! 😝. I wonder if Tony does!!? 🤔... So now let's sit back & enjoy my response to the Heller's story's, again!!! .......... Storytelling time again kiddies!!! 😝 🤗... "The belief that carbon dioxide controls earth's temperature is a superstition which has no basis in science" 😳. "A civilization which bases policy on superstition is doomed to failure". 😳... Ok so ... https://youtu.be/y1MZ8U8C9c8 . 🤔... Though I really do love all the news clippings & graphs Tony uses!!! 😝. Quite entertaining hey!!... So is he a 🤡 Or a 👹!!?... Cherry picking & software design is obviously & definitely Tony's speciality!!!. & Now he is combining the two!! 😝 😳... @8.48 China was definitely a very advanced society back in them days hey!!? 😝. Just one of the very many example of cherry picking I could provide, in just this video!!. 🤔... Ok so let's get a little more serious should we!??. Yeh well why not!! 🤗... @10.50 So this is a more accurate graph & the one we should go off then yes!!?... Ok so can we all agree on that then!!. Well Tony does!!! 😝 👍. So we have a mean temperature of about 0.15 in 1878, yes!??. Well yes, Tony said so!! 😝. Ok, so he knows so!!!. Proven by his facts & what he said, was a very accurate graph!!!... But hang on!!. Rewind to @7.06 & Tony's designer graph show's something different!??. & He very specifically points out 1878 for you & the high of .5 as the mean temperature!!? 🤔. Why!!?. Obviously this is for his following propaganda that follows!!!... Now that for you my friends, is home grown shit man!!. Yeh my friends the good shit hey!!! 😝. So who's tampering!!? 🤔. Yes, Tony is tampering!!. & Yes, Tony is definitely deceiving you, getting payed & getting funding form people like you, the fossil fuel industries & the heartland institute!!!... Conclusion!!. Yep, he's one of those 👹's... BTW!!. If you tell a lie big enough & repeat it often enough, it becomes the truth!!. Then the sheepies will start to believe & follow you!!!... Well apart from the 3%er's!!. Ok so maybe it's only the 2%!!!

Bandit6

- 4 years ago  

Ah, our resident retard speaks again, "in retard language, sitting retards and their minions" There s no sense in looking at your resources as they are all left leaning marxist stupid hypothesis with not reality in the reality.Models are for retards, have you not figured that out by now? Oh I forgot! You are our resident retard! And your village is looking for you..... Oh, no they are not! They are happy you are gone! God help us as you seem to have ended up here, spewing your bullshit (that everyone but notmev sees as bullshit)

TonyHeller666No_4

- 4 years ago  

Oh I forgot! You love to benditover & take it from Tony don't you!! 😝. You remember this one yeh!!. It was from Tony to you! So how could you not!!! 🤗 💕 ... https://youtu.be/NLrt-IELUY8 ... Sorry man, I did genuinely forgot hey!!!

62e_Lives

- 4 years ago  

@TonyHelller666No_4 Stop your whining nigger!

ClimateCraze

- 4 years ago  

Like Ian Plimer says, the next Ice Age will start on Tuesday, but we're not sure which year.

gs4848

- 4 years ago  

Excellent, Tony! This fundamental truth needs to be reiterated everyday, because the left has a very short memory. Keep it up!

TonyHeller666No_4

- 4 years ago  

No he needs to keep telling you guys everyday because you all live in a fish bowl!!! 😝

fiendbear

- 4 years ago  

Excellent synopsis Tony. Every climate alarmist should be forced to watch your videos. Unfortunately, it's easier to convince someone of a lie, than it is to convince them they've been lied to.

TonyHeller666No_4

- 4 years ago  

Kinda like a Hitler situation!!?. Or a re-education camp like China situation!?? 🤔... Which do you reckon would work best!!!

FleaMagnet

- 4 years ago  

Michael Mann, A person so insecure that he has to sue people when they disagree with him. Who in their right mind would want to trust someone that insane, especially a so-called scientist?

MichaelDomansky

- 4 years ago  

I am sharing via link copy because I am again in Zuckerberg Prison for offending Libtards.

John_Crowfeather

- 4 years ago  

Natural gas turbines generate twice the electric power as coal for the same CO2 output. And natural gas is renewable. Natural gas would appear to be at least a reasonable transition to non-thermal renewables. But the climate totalitarians don't like it either.

TonyHeller666No_4

- 4 years ago  

Natural gas renewable!!? 😳... 🤔

Bandit6

- 4 years ago  

Hey retard TonyHeller666No_4 what makes you think it is not renewable? Can you prove that it is not? Or are you just spewing your lame bullshit again? That is what I thought...

TonyHeller666No_4

- 4 years ago  

Hey retard!!. Of course it renewable!!!. I didn't say it wasn't, Tony's bum boy!! 😝. Or what ever the fuck your name is!!!. It may take a few million or billion years!. But hey, I'm sure it will renew itself!! 🙄

BWK

- 4 years ago  

Dr. Pierre Latour: Engineering Earth's Thermostat with CO2? | EU2014 https://youtu.be/bJ55koi7vaA

TonyHeller666No_3

- 4 years ago  

Oh shit!!!. I am now below!! 😳... Thank God from above!!! 😝 🙏 😇

Brownie's gun channel

- 4 years ago  

The post below shows how insane people communicate. As obnoxious as it is, Tony should leave it right there as a confirmation of the mentally unstable people out there that become violent when another point of view is posed. Look! It swears, it rants, it cries. It is the crayon eater666 again.

TonyHeller666No_3

- 4 years ago  

Poor Tony!!! 😢... What he can't handle what he gives!!? Have you seen other popular posts!!? 😝... Are you a bit of a sook too!??... Or a bit of a show pony, like Tony! 🤔

TonyHeller666No_4

- 4 years ago  

How do you like my bestie at the moment!!? 🤔... Benditover I think he calls himself!!. I think he's having relationship problems with Tony & is try to crack onto me hey!!! 😝... Gotta love them! 🤗

Elvisboy777

- 4 years ago  

Thank you.

TonyHeller666No_4

- 4 years ago  

Your welcome 😊

seedofchange

- 4 years ago  

Of course, weall know correlation does not equal causation so, interestingly, we might ask ourselves what drives the AMDO? Anything under human control? See also Prof Otto Weiss et al on extracting very good fit for temperature from several hundred years of observations by identifying several cycles using Fourier analysis. One of these being the AMDO, but there are many others from a few to a few hundred thousand years and probably several yet to be discovered. In addition, work by many others, notably, Prof Zarkhova on the sun's barycentric oscillations brought about by the planetary orbital dynamics of our solar sysyem, clearly demonstrate that our planet's atmosphere is significantly affected by cycles completely independent of and beyond any human control. Add into the mix Prof Svensmark's works on cosmic ray variations and the effects on cloud cover and we start to see how far the charlatans and the CO2 demonisation have strayed from any notion of real science. Of course, many in the alarmist camp point to the work of the IPCC without taking account of the in-built confirmation bias of that political organisation which exists solely to maximise human and ignore/minimise every other facet of the root causes of atmospheric variability. It exists solely to prop up the aspirations of the banker compromised UN to 'world governance' (read totalitarianism) by an unelected, unaccountable and non-removable bureaucratic elite. Even though, as many, besides Tony Heller, endlessly point out, their 'science' holds as much water as a leaky collander. Its a brainwashing exercise which has had trillions thrown at it and been going for sixty years or more. This latest virus mania is also part of the scheme They want to see how far we will willingly go down the road to ruin, driven by pseudoscience, mass hysteria and propagandised fear mongering. Apparently... we're mostly sleepwalking right into it. The dumbing down seems to be working. Do not comply.

TonyHeller666No_3

- 4 years ago  

WOW!!!... You kinda sound smart man!!... 🤔

BWK

- 4 years ago  

The sun is in control of climate along with other space effects. Humans have 0 effect on it.

TonyHeller666No_4

- 4 years ago  

The sun god!!?... 🤔

notmev

- 4 years ago  

Svensmark wrote about cosmic rays, clouds, and global warming years and years ago. Many people disputed his theory: http://ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/myths/henrik-svensmark Why do you think he has not published an update in the last 10 years? With more updated data he could blow away all those corrupt climate scientists? He has written other things, bu nothing in pubmed. Maybe you know of an update???

Smoking_Dog

- 4 years ago  

I have only two words: Milankovitch cycles.

TonyHeller666No_3

- 4 years ago  

Yeh of course that's got shit to do with it!!! 🙄

notmev

- 4 years ago  

Which aspect of the Milankovitch cycles (eccentricity, axial tilt, and precession) is causing an increase in solar radiation at this point in time? And by how much?

Geneva

- 4 years ago  

Excellent info as always. Thank you Tony.

TonyHeller666No_3

- 4 years ago  

Those 97%er's can't be wrong!!!

Bandit6

- 4 years ago  

TonyHeller666No_3 Oh but the 3% can be? HAHAHAHA! You really are a retard! Changing your name from 1 to 2 to 3 to 4 what a fuck wad rock troll

TonyHeller666No_4

- 4 years ago  

Are you & Tony having relationship problems at all??. Don't get angry, I'm just asking ok!!. As I thought ever since he's enlargement & you using a coconut as a but plug, everything was going great!!?... 🤔