Dr. Patrick Moore points out that atmospheric CO2 was on a steady decline before humans started using fossil fuels. That trend would have continued, and ultimately led to the death of plants. Humans are the only species that could have released CO2 back into the biosphere that was locked up as fossil fuel. Life on Earth thrived when atmospheric CO2 levels were 10 times higher than today. There are apparently many more benefits than costs related to increased CO2. There really isn't much evidence of significant "global" warming in 15 years. I'm guessing that "global greening" from CO2 would have some effect on climate. I'm not sure if droughts would be a primary concern.

These are the kinds of shows that make me sick to my stomach. They continue to argue about the dangers of government policies, but, in the end it still endorse the idea that CO2 significantly effects global climate temperatures. It does not. I'm tired of guys like Alex trying to ride two horses with one ass because they are afraid to adamantly refute government claims about CO2 effects.

Megan is a lawyer, a good student of the law (graduated from Albany Law) and can be a good interviewer but on this short clip with author Alex Epstein on her podcast she starts out by saying global warming is real. Then jackass Alex Epstein says global warming exists but 3 billion using dung and wood to cook are worse off than using fossil fuels. Then 10% worldwide without fossil fuels, use waste water to farm and cause many deaths in doing so by disease. If they only use fossil fuels all would be better. The best part if this vid is Megan’s ending commercial for a staycation in the Michel Phelps pool. Megan and Alex say fossil fuels are bad and will incinerate us but for the 5 billion not using fossil fuels for heating, cooling and farming their lives are way worse before we incinerate us all. ————— FOSSIL FUELS USE WILL NOT INCINERATE US!!! Good grief Megan and Alex stop drinking the tea!!!

That's if the earth was warming. Alex needs to listen to Tony.

An aside - those declaring eminent waterworld scenario are propagandists, not scientists. Even if the world was warming - which it isn't - the total volume of ice and snow on earth is given as 155,000 cubic km. That is only enough (assuming that all of it currently sits on land above current sea level - which it isn't) to raise current sea level ~ 4 to 5 inches. Amount of snow and ice currently sitting on water will not raise level of that water by melting.

This contradicts the previous video. A video that explains the use of "adjusted data" would be nice.

our roomate's mom makes $72 an hour at home, she has been unemployed for two months and last month her check was $21204 just working at home two hours per day... go to this link >>>https://www.paid.skyfly8.com

Even taking rubbish theory at face value, there is no climate crisis. As it is, the greenhouse effect is as scientifically respectable as a proposal for a perpetual motion machine. Come to think of it, isn't that pretty well the solution offered by the climate cranks?

He won't get through to the climate loonies, like AU new, prime minster who wants to take real action on climate change, or increase electricity and gas, and create more power blackouts for unreliable crap. Only a matter of time before a genius develops an overunity device and shares it!

Lifting the face works real well for Kelly. This guy, Epstein, is a philosopher and energy expert. So, he has two hats. He has an imbalance in his diet. (Could be the alcohol) His voice is loaded with estrogen. Watching her be a barker for a product is just fun.