https://www.infowars.com/posts/un-globalists-seek-to-decriminalise-sex-with-minors/ You can see the way they open the door a crack to begin normalizing their BS agendas and begin courts and judges to normalize the BS using fancy Court and Judicial names in their associations. A Judge then sites these names in their BS ruling to placate the obvious retardedness of this dystopic ruling And to avoid someone shooting the Judge, he is just doing his job. And finally and most important is that it is reasonable to look at many things and any normal discussion would exclude a very young person who has no ability to have consensual sex so age is key. The key in what they write is they make all these inclusive sounding things and mention all things should be looked at when under 18s engage in sex which is correct and of course we are lead to believe they are talking about 17 and 16 year olds which do certainly have much ability to chime in on sex. But of course they don’t say that, we ASS u ME that they mean older children or young adults. But in fact they mean babies too. Recall recently that babies are asked to pick out clothes and if they pick girls clothes and have a penis they will cut off the penis. Yes, this is true. They are asked n kindergarten if the boy likes girls and he says no of course, and they cut off the penis or call him gay. And finally I will explain the Legal Ease of what they have done in this most Alex Jones deceptive manner. In the statement they say all things are to be considered which is correct and reasonable but they say this “and with SPECIFIC ATTENTION to NON-discrimination GUARANTEES” what this means is that even though a baby has no ability to consent in any way ever, we will not weigh attention to that inability as much as we weigh the Specific Attention of the fact the baby has GUARANTEES on NON-DISCRIMINATION by AGE. Even Infowars has highlighted the wrong thing deliberately.