PCR Genetic Testing Fraud & Nasal Swabs for Bio-Specific Weapons https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-trials-2-0/f/pcr-genetic-testing-fraud-nasal-swabs-for-bio-specific-weapons https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/open-letter-to-denis-rancourt-have "It may be that viruses are small... and that is certainly the case." Oh really? Paraphrasing: "And maybe viruses have a genome, and maybe their genomes are unique, and maybe they can use PCR and know what their genome is, and maybe they can use PCR on an unpurified sample and detect that genome." Respectfully, have you lost your mind? Why are you feeding this nonsense, instead of plainly stating that all tests for a purely hypothetical, never-shown-to-exist, replication-competent intracellular obligate parasite that is contagious and causes disease via natural routes of exposure are fraudulent and useless and cannot possibly be validated? Why do you suggest that we attack the PCR tests - as if this hasn't already been done ad nauseum since 2020? No-virus people attacked all of the tests, long ago. No-virus people attacked the fake "virus isolation", long ago. No-virus people attacked the fake "virus sequencing", long ago. No-virus people attacked the "point and declare" EM idiocy, long ago. No-virus people attacked the horrific, useless animal experiments, long ago. No-virus people have been there, done that, Denis. In fact, some no-virus people have gone far beyond this. "I told the public I'm going to look into whether or not we can answer this question. What I meant was....I'm going to study that (PCR) technique." - Baloney. You indicated you were looking into whether or not viruses have been shown to exist. "I think PCR is an over-hyped technique that is not able to do what they claim it does... in my view. That's my bias." This is what we've waited over a year for? To hear that you “THINK” PCR is "over-hyped" and that that's your “BIAS”? +++++