I can also say that through my work as a medical transcriptionist I am very familiar with the requirements of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act, which is the act which guarantees a person's medical information is kept private. The ACT requires that personal information be kept private that might reveal the person's identity, such as a name, address, or phone number, etc. General information on a case is allowed to be released that does not reveal a person's identity, such as a diagnosis or dates of medical occurrences. There is no reason to redact the dates of these vaccine adverse events.

Eashoa speaking to the Jews: THIS TESTIMONY CONFIRMED WITH THE EVANGELIZING GOSPEL! John 8:44. "You come from your father the Devil, and in the service of your father you are content* to be enslaved, [to him] who is the killer of mankind* from the beginning, who never upholds the truth, for truth does not abide* in him, and when he speaks lies, he speaks of his own genesis, for he is a Liar, [like] his father* also. *Reference is to Satan that ancient SERPENT 🐍 the evangelizing gospel at tinyurl.com/Ashurit http://newtube.app/user/Sarrah/Gv0haup

It is important to understand why these health officers defer to these organizations consider to be a higher authority rather than relying on the knowledge base they have developed in their education and hopefully working as a doctor. It is essentially a case of covering their ass legally, as they are deathly afraid a being held legally accountable if they get something wrong and believe they cannot be held accountable for anything they do or say as long as they can point to instructions from a higher authority. The same can be said of doctors in general with regard to their medical associations. In fact, I think their actual credo is first cover your ass instead of first do no harm, which no doctor actually takes as an official oath anymore after graduating from medical school. Of course, there are some doctors that still go by first do no harm, but they are few in number.

I do not believe it was a mistake of global news to say that cancer patients would be getting the MRNA vaccines because the Alberta Government also was advising cancer patients to get this.

It has always been curious to me how they have people with cancer that are undergoing chemotherapy at the top of the list of receiving these injections. Chemotherapy is notorious for destroying a person's immune system at least temporarily, and the whole theory of vaccination is that it works by stimulating an immune response in the individual who receives it, so there is no point and giving any vaccine to a person who does not have the ability to mount an immune response to whatever is being injected. In my work as a medical transcriptionist in Canada, I did one death summary chart of a person with a type of lymphoma with a relatively long survival rate and had undergone chemotherapy, and in fact the patient had survived through the entire so-called pandemic until shortly after they would have received one of these vaccines. I don't know specifically that the person received the vaccine, but given that the province in which I worked was advising such people to take them, it would be almost certain that the person received one shortly before they died as the person died within the time frame given in this video for such people.