There is video evidence from people who witnessed the event in person and took their own video and gave their own testimony. The video from the news stations was also live, and I myself witnessed video on live TV of the second plane hitting the tower on the day it happened. People who want this to be some grand complicated conspiracy should think in simpler terms; namely, that those in the Bush administration had advanced knowledge of the terrorists being in the United States and their plot and did nothing to stop it. This is far more plausible than claiming videos were faked and planes were flown remotely.
Ok "Mr Plausible" keep those blinkers on and hope for the best. Tally Ho! ....If,however, you are actually interested look at: The Hutchinson Effect, Direct Energy Weapons (DEW), Free Fall Speed and a million tons of rubble hitting the Hudson Bay. "What happened to the rubble?"
Conspirator A: "We have to create a holographic projection system to project large aircraft into the air so that we can crash them into the building."
Conspirator B: "Wouldn't it be easier to just use real planes?"
Conspirator A: "... and we're going to need to get some large aircraft parts, like a set of landing gear, to chunk onto the street below just as the "crash" happens."
Conspirator B: "Wouldn't it be easier to just use real airplanes?"
Conspirator A: "Then we'll have to gather up every video made by every person who filmed the event and doctor them."
Conspirator B: "Let's just use real planes."
Mr. "Believe it" is an enemy of truth. His purpose is to make you look stupid if you doubt any 'official story.' Reporter 1: "These guys doubt the results of the 2020 election." Reporter 2: "Yeah, but they also think holographic airplanes flew into the towers, so there's no point listening to them."
Volkner: I think there was a conspiracy but that it was much simpler even than what you're saying. If they had foreknowledge of what these people were up to, they simply just had to let it happen and perhaps eliminate anybody who tried to expose it beforehand. The other replies to my comment represent true conspiratorial nuttiness, and they are actually playing the role of useful idiots by distracting anyone from taking the simpler conspiratorial explanation above just out of the sheer nuttiness of their beliefs.
5 Comments
MichaelAttoe
- 2 years ago
There is video evidence from people who witnessed the event in person and took their own video and gave their own testimony. The video from the news stations was also live, and I myself witnessed video on live TV of the second plane hitting the tower on the day it happened. People who want this to be some grand complicated conspiracy should think in simpler terms; namely, that those in the Bush administration had advanced knowledge of the terrorists being in the United States and their plot and did nothing to stop it. This is far more plausible than claiming videos were faked and planes were flown remotely.
The Red Pill Toolkit
- 2 years ago
Ok "Mr Plausible" keep those blinkers on and hope for the best. Tally Ho! ....If,however, you are actually interested look at: The Hutchinson Effect, Direct Energy Weapons (DEW), Free Fall Speed and a million tons of rubble hitting the Hudson Bay. "What happened to the rubble?"
The Red Pill Toolkit
- 2 years ago
https://newtube.app/MichaelJohnson/7Spg3pM
Volkner
- 2 years ago
Conspirator A: "We have to create a holographic projection system to project large aircraft into the air so that we can crash them into the building." Conspirator B: "Wouldn't it be easier to just use real planes?" Conspirator A: "... and we're going to need to get some large aircraft parts, like a set of landing gear, to chunk onto the street below just as the "crash" happens." Conspirator B: "Wouldn't it be easier to just use real airplanes?" Conspirator A: "Then we'll have to gather up every video made by every person who filmed the event and doctor them." Conspirator B: "Let's just use real planes." Mr. "Believe it" is an enemy of truth. His purpose is to make you look stupid if you doubt any 'official story.' Reporter 1: "These guys doubt the results of the 2020 election." Reporter 2: "Yeah, but they also think holographic airplanes flew into the towers, so there's no point listening to them."
MichaelAttoe
- 2 years ago
Volkner: I think there was a conspiracy but that it was much simpler even than what you're saying. If they had foreknowledge of what these people were up to, they simply just had to let it happen and perhaps eliminate anybody who tried to expose it beforehand. The other replies to my comment represent true conspiratorial nuttiness, and they are actually playing the role of useful idiots by distracting anyone from taking the simpler conspiratorial explanation above just out of the sheer nuttiness of their beliefs.