ONLY Tony knows why he does what he does!!... 🤔. Maybe the Trumpet too! 😝

SilentSun nice name. Does that mean you think the sun influences things on Earth? This is why there is more to it, Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai explains it well. Dr. Shiva is too smart for .666" Dick to comprehend. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYD0doql-5k

I so disagree!!!. I'm way smarter the dr who ever the fuck you said!! 😝... &, You too 🤗

Did you ask God!!? 😝... 🤔

At least Tony isn't a vacuous asshole regurgitating Klaus Schwab talking points. In 25 years we will see how hot things are and who is right.

@Scrotalgia - We've already done that. All the wrong predictions about global warming from the 1980s onward have all proven to be wrong. But they persist in this myth anyway. ... And don't waste your time on this guy especially.

@Outrigger Exxon's predictions from 1982 are actually good: https://skepticalscience.com/1982-exxon-accurate-prediction.html Even the Exxon scientists using antiquated models are better than denialist predictions. But then you are left with your only recourse now, all the data is false. Even the lower troposphere data. Or if you can't hide enough from the data, the warming is normal, or it is caused by something else to do be determined at some time in the future.

Fuck you you little punk. Go back to momma's basement

notmev - Denialist predictions? To the extent "denialist" make predicts, a pox on their house. I don't care that some are acting stupid like the climate alarmists, claiming they can predict the climate. The people I respect don't make these predictions, like Tony Heller. Man, you're really getting desperate to make a point.

Still nothing useful to contribute.

Yeh rigger!!!... Nothing!!

Yes!!... But do you!!?... 🤔

If this wasn't coming from some scank!!. I might have believed ya!!!

For anyone doubting this statement please check out The Bill Marr Show for Friday Feb. 26. It is really when he objects.

Small changes!!?. 🤔... So you are admitting changes!??

@Pajama Boy 666, I will use small words to get this across to you. The climate is always changing. We are not responsible for it. There, is that simple enough for you?

I said worming!!! 😝... But yeh, that cause changes too!! 😝... Can you prove that CO2 & other greenhouse gases are not!!?... I'm sure you can! 🤗

In answer to your question: Government subsidies eliminates their risks. And you forgot the part of the non-carbon generation quote "if renewable technology continues to advance" I have worked as a consulting environmental engineer for 30+ years and the subsidies are coming back. I am writing increasing numbers of proposals for projects for "green" energy companies. As one engineer who worked in the renewables section of one of the largest power utilities in the US told me when I asked him how they made any money on renewables despite their obvious output inefficiencies: "The math does not work. It's all about subsidies."

@John_Crowfeather First how long ago did that engineer say "the math does not work"? Could you look at these doc and tell me why I'm interpreting them wrong and arriving at a differnt conclusion than what you state? Thanks. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/electricity_generation.pdf https://www.lazard.com/perspective/lcoe2020

Yes, underinvestment in gas and coal in Texas, in favor of wind. Really stupid, being woke on energy. .......“Perhaps the Platte River Power Association, which produces power for Northern Colorado, and TH mentions in this video, has a truth for you since you can't understand Texas. PRPA's wind farms in Wyoming froze, but since there was LITTLE WIND ANYWAY, that didn't matter. PRPA then decided to fire up it's gas generating plant but found out that Excel didn't have the gas to supply, especially since Excel was prioritizing residential usage over electrical generation. .....So PRPA was left with 3 coal fired plants to keep the residents of Northern Colorado from freezing to death. These 3 plants were going full blast, but were not quite not enough to carry the increased electrical consumption caused by the cold, so PRPA called for consumers to start reducing their energy consumption. Well, the lights and the heat stayed on (just barely), despite the failure of wind energy. The residents of Northern Colorado didn't freeze to death thanks to coal. .... Bottom line? Increased "Green" energy, less reliable and more expensive electricity. https://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/20...”

It's kind of a religion, that if the wind and solar fail. like in Northern Colorado, or the UK, you just call over to another area of the country and get the power you need? Well this Arctic blast affected a huge area of the US, and there may be little or no excess over large swaths of the country. And these Arctic High Pressures bring little wind and they put snow on solar panels during the already short winter day, and you gonna find more people asking for power than can give it.

https://portside.org/2021-02-19/wind-turbines-can-handle-cold-just-fine-just-look-iowa

We all know the little ice age and the Medieval warm period and the Dark ages were all just fairy tales. Climate was perfect until recently. Goldilocks knew it was just fine.

@Billington You just throw out a bunch of red herrings that have nothing to do with anthropogenic climate change. Go back to sticking your head in the dirt.

Michael Mann said that. Will you say the same to him?

No wind turbine works without wind, and the high pressure cold fronts come with very little wind.

notmev so the Little Ice Age is fake? Who is the denier now?

Billy Big Dick Boy!!!. That Tony loves!! 😝... Yes they were fake!!!... When Tony talks about them!! 😝. 🤔...

So Pajama Boy, because T H said it you don’t believe it? You are really some kind of hater.

.666" dick, I don't know how you know it, but you say I am Billy big dick? Thank you. You certainly were not the first to tell me that, I'm very "cocksure". I guess the word gets around.

@Billington It isn't the word that got around like you think. It was description about how the flock of sheep run whenever you get near.

Notmev only addresses a tiny percentage of the points Tony Heller brings up. Most of Tony's points go untouched. (From the start, I thought the helicopter spraying a frozen wind turbine was a impractical stunt, and unimportant. But here comes Notmev, making it important). Incredible.

The Little Ice Age or the Medieval Warm Period were hoaxes, the climate was a straight, constant line, never changing until cows started farting?

Now we're taking!!!. Billy Big Dick Boy!! 😝... Hey so how's Tony 'really' going!!? 🤔

Ignore all the snow in the Northern Hemisphere, blanketing places like Glacier National Park. https://usicecenter.gov/products/ims/ims_v3/ims_gif/ARCHIVE/NHem/2021/ims2021060.gif

@Billington You got me. It snows during the winter. I have no recourse but to admit that humans are not causing climate change.

Kids just won't know what snow is.

Why!??... Cause it goes for nearly half an hour!!? 😝... 🤔

Excellent! Haha.

All you guys really love Tony & the media hey!! 😝. Brainwashed muched or what!!! 🙄 ... https://youtu.be/C0J8j7GuLuQ

@My Bright Channel here is a nice list of ice age predictions from climate denialists https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6eswiI3KLc&t=34s

@NotMev: I am amused at your name for us. Climate deniers? That is sort of simplistic, don’t you think? We do not deny climate. There has been climate on this planet for over for 1 billion years. The climate warms and the climate cools. It did that long before humans came along. We deny that humans are causing the climate to warm.

@FleaMagnet How about anthropogenic climate change denialists? I'll will be more pendatic in the future.

notmev did the little ice age happen, or the Medieval warm period happen?

Please call me an anthropogenic global warming denier.

Nah!!... I'm going to stick with flea brain thanks!!! 😝

What is your theory for a worming planet then!!?. As it's quite overwhelming obviously, it is!!... Even deniers agree!!! 😝... But it's natural!!!... 🤔

@Pajama Boy 666, is it now people causing worms to multiply?

Natural!!! 😝 🤗...

Have you seen the documentary "Little Ice Age, Big Chill"? In it is Brian M. Fagan, a prolific British author of popular archaeology books and a professor emeritus of Anthropology at the University of California, Santa Barbara. He talks about the burning of witches and in his book "The Little Ice Age: How Climate Made History, 1300-1850" Fagan writes: "Between 1580 and 1620, the citizens of Bern, Switzerland burned over 1,000 people to death." That is just one town in a span of 40 years!

If you do watch documentary Little Ice Age, Big Chill, at the 23:00 mark Fagan starts talking about witches and at 23:45 they say "according to some historians, 50,000 men and women charged with brewing up diabolical storms were burned at the stake."

Hey did you get back to me at all Billy Boy!!?... https://youtu.be/ziqeZTruWMY... Lean towards the facts!!!. The force is on your side!! 😝

Atlas Pro again? .666" dick? This is silly, and a guy who I have seen a long time before you showed it to me. I will ask you again, Was the Little Ice Age, Medieval Warm Period, The Dark Ages, and the Roman Climate Optimum real?

I'm sure you did!!. Dick 🤗... & I'm sure you don't understand! Or read my previous comments!!!... 🤔

The alarmists will say global warming caused it to be a cool summer

Is that what you really think is it kzvx!!?... So what do you really think!??

STUF!! 😝

Oops!!. Typo!!!... STFU!! 😝 👍

Nothing about Sweden importing coal power from Poland? Yeah, Sweden did great. ......And then there was the very cold winter of 2010 in Europe where Arctic high pressures parked over Britain often with little or no wind. Yeah, the wind turbine heating kept the blades ice free, but the wind hardly ever came, and wind farms became net consumers of electricity warming the blades. ,,,, And there is so so so much more in this video than Swedish deicing of wind turbines.

Yes, underinvestment in gas and coal in Texas, in favor of wind. Really stupid, being woke on energy. .......“Perhaps the Platte River Power Association, which produces power for Northern Colorado, and TH mentions in this video, has a truth for you since you can't understand Texas. PRPA's wind farms in Wyoming froze, but since there was LITTLE WIND ANYWAY, that didn't matter. PRPA then decided to fire up it's gas generating plant but found out that Excel didn't have the gas to supply, especially since Excel was prioritizing residential usage over electrical generation. .....So PRPA was left with 3 coal fired plants to keep the residents of Northern Colorado from freezing to death. These 3 plants were going full blast, but were not quite not enough to carry the increased electrical consumption caused by the cold, so PRPA called for consumers to start reducing their energy consumption. Well, the lights and the heat stayed on (just barely), despite the failure of wind energy. The residents of Northern Colorado didn't freeze to death thanks to coal. .... Bottom line? Increased "Green" energy, less reliable and more expensive electricity. https://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/20...”

I wonder about the time and /or helicopter resources if thousands of wind mills have to be deiced airborne, preferrably at once. - Anyway, no blade heating without rotating mills, or else energy has to be tapped from the grid exactly when it is needed most for keeping households warm.

@MrRumpelstilzchen100 By that same illogic, energy needed to maintain higher temperatures in well heads, electric controls, and gas piping would be taken away from households when they most need it. I guess that is why wind turbines in the far north hemisphere stop running all during winter. I just did not realize it, maybe you need to get in touch with those countries and let them know that wind turbine electrical generation just doesn't work during the winter.

@Outrigger "Nothing about Sweden importing coal power from Poland?" The truth is in the details. So, how much electrical generation did Sweden get from all that coal importing? Give it a try and back up your fear mongering? How much renewable energy does Sweden produce compared to coal, or hell, lump oil,gas, and coal together! Once again you need to get in touch with the swedish energy authorities and lay done some of your brilliance so they stop going down the renewable path before it is too late.

@outrigger https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_the_United_Kingdom#/media/File:UK_electricity_production_by_source.png Once again, your brilliant diagnosis of the pitfalls of renewables are falling on the deaf ears of the United Kingdom's energy experts. You have to stop their madness please. They are going in the wrong direction, death and destruction awaits them. Renewables will cause havoc.

Fear mongering? Wow! Kind of out there, eh?. I think it's a happy story that Sweden was able to get coal fired electricity from Poland to keep Greta Thuneberg and others warm. .... And I'll bet'ja the power was significant, even if on the margins. I mean, Sweden wouldn't have called for it if they weren't a little worried about their power situation . Sorry to besmirch Sweden's power purity.

You're next post to me makes no sense at all. Been hittin' the bottle a little?

Why do you guys not talk to me anymore!!? 😢. Rumpleskin is definitely my favourite! 😝. Sorry, your outness!!!... Unless you want to make up!!? 😀

Nice song.

Old man, listen to my life!!... 😉

Simplicity is what is need for simple!!... Did you watch it all!??

https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2019/09/fact-check-no-the-glaciers-are-not-growing-in-glacier-national-park/ https://www.usgs.gov/centers/norock/science/retreat-glaciers-glacier-national-park?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects

Experts said Glacier National Park would be ice-free by 1948, and 1961 and 2002 and 2020 and 2044. The climate alarmist clown show never ends. ...... https://realclimatescience.com/2018/10/ice-free-glacier-national-park-update/ …

@Outrigger Denialist "experts" have been saying and predicting glaciers are growing, nothing to see here,...https://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/11/27/glaciers-in-norway-alaska-growing-again/ http://lysanderspooneruniversity.com/2018/12/glaciers-continue-to-grow-in-glacier-national-park/ http://www.jamulblog.com/2008/11/glaciers-growing.html For example, in 1910 there were over 150 glaciers in Glacier National Park, and there are less than 30 now. But you never mention that do you. https://www.bustle.com/p/how-to-argue-with-a-climate-change-denier-in-the-most-productive-way-18667844 So, since you can't listen to climate scientists because predictions have been wrong in the past and therefore the scientists are always wrong, why can't all the wrong predictions by climate denialists lead to not believing anything they say? But your brain is so miswired that you can't even see the hypocrisy in your thinking.

Sorry, there were 150 glaciers in Glacier National Park in 1850 at the end of the Little Ice Age, when they started their retreat, long before SUVs. I agree, there's been mostly a warming trend since then. ..... And I don't care if someone else says the glaciers are growing. That's their problem, trying to predict the climate.

continued from above - It seems it's the last 30 or so glaciers that won't go away, you know, during this time of "high" CO2.

How, dumb, are you!!?... 🤔... You won't see hey!!!

@Outrigger "It seems it's the last 30 or so glaciers that won't go away, you know, during this time of "high" CO2." Do you deny that the amount of ice in glacier national park is not decreasing in the last 30 years? You keep harping on failed predictions, while ignoring that the trend line is going down and accelerating. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/3/2019/11/06_SROCC_Ch02_FINAL.pdf https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/05/24/climate/mapping-50-years-of-ice-loss-in-glacier-national-park.html

Outrigger, don't worry about what notmev says, that person doesn't even believe that the Little Ice Age or the Medieval Warm Period happened. Notmev is the real climate change denier.

You sure love your {adjusted} data temperature graphs, don’t you?

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3402/polar.v33.21349

The next time you go to your doctor please ask for your adjusted body temperature, or adjusted height, or your adjusted blood pressure.

Actually in a way I do. My home blood pressure machine is not as accurate as the doctors. So I bring it in and compare my machine to theirs and then adjust mine accordingly. If you have a real problem temperature adjustments, something that is actually a technical viewpoint, please post. Tell me what was done wrong. Pick any temperature series, what the adjustments where, and why you disagree. Or, if you are not smart enough to technically rip apart the adjustments, link to a scientist and what they say. Give it a try. Don't be like tony or the other morons that follow his beliefs. Try a real technical discussion on the errors of adjustments.

@notmev: Other than you would make us believe, reasons for adjustments are not of such an esoteric kind that they can't be explained in some detail to the general public. Even the workings of an A-bomb can be explained to some degree of complexity to laymen/the general public. Which is why I'm begging you for some explanation why the general public isn't granted some insight by the outpourings of MSM and social media gurus? So please, why is that - what do you think? You know, this reeks of “follow the climatology funding!”

Actually, I object to any kind of so called adjustments to climate data such as temperature. Any adjustment can only reflect the bias of the adjustor. Michael Mann proved that.

@FleaMagnet: That's too strict, IMHO. Methods of measurement could be enhanced, noise from micro-environment could be taken into account in a better way - but all of this should be layed out to the general public, instead of the fear porn by MSM we are bombarded with.

Rumple still skin, mini statisticians would probably agree with my statement. Temperature proxies have been notorious in missing temperature rises and falls. Since the year 2000 the human civilization has been asked, demanded!, To spend billions and billions of dollars on what some so-called climatologist say may happen as a result of our affect on the climate.

ushcn:https://judithcurry.com/2016/02/09/assessing-u-s-temperature-adjustments-using-the-climate-reference-network/ It is not the responsibility of climate scientists to try and explain the technical issues to the general public. The language used by the two have very little overlap. If you have ever worked in science or engineering you would understand that even in similar areas there is sometime little overlap. We used to spend most of the time in our meetings in the 90s ,when digital and analog designers were in the same meeting, just trying to agree on what words meant what. Now you want climate scientists to explain something without watering it down, which doesn't work because watering it down or a top level view is viewed by people like you as lies.

Your welcome!! 🥰