Hey just a quick question!!... If you had a chance! Would you lick, Tony's asshole!??... 🤔

Keep your face diaper on sheep . Everybody that gets covid is wearing one. .🐑😷 Perhaps the diaper will stop you from exhaling the 3 pounds of co2 you are expelling everyday.

you must be the local clown.

The best part is, this clown makes people listen to Tony even more.

please tell me what are you smoking much better then any thing i can get.. try reading a science book ( if you can read) most likely your just one of tonys many coat tail riders see my song coat tail riders

It's called cat's hair!! 👍. Fucken good shit man!!! 😝. Are you like still smoking dog's hair!!? 🙄 🤔... Oh I can read!! But can you!??... https://youtu.be/68QbPnGQNFA ... This bloke can also sing! 😝. But do you understand!!?. Hey I did try to make it easy for you by sharing the lyrics!!. That is if you can read & comprehend!!!

bet your an asshole from england come on admit it blood pudding and all that crap

Your only half right Oldman!! 😝 🤔... Two guesses left.

Concerned = Propagandists

Now you're using the tampered with noaa data, nice. The little Ice age was real. No shit we have warmed a little since the coldest time in a thousand years. Thank you for your knowledge.

@Billington There is multiple ways that the temperature data is adjusted. Please detail what adjustment methods you disagree with and any papers that support your "tampered" belief.

Raw versus adjusted? I'll go with raw. I do like that you use Dr. Judith "Whore For Oil" (as called by other Climate Bigots) Curry for your argument for adjustments though, but you do know she is a skeptic.

@Billington Yes, I know she is a sceptic, but she is a scientist and presents things from that perspective. Who calls her a whore for oil? She has her biases, so what. Attack her for her scientific methods if you disagree with her.

Since you are not dick like .666" dick I'll give you some of my time. What do you know about speleothems (cave formations)? This is an article about the LIA and it's affect in South America. https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-07/fda-rsh072418.php

@Billington '"When we look at the paleoclimate data for the period corresponding to the LIA, we see more cold in South America, but the rainfall patterns changed," Novello said. From this information, it can be concluded that if the climate grows colder in the northern hemisphere, it rains more in the southern hemisphere. The moisture convergence ends up moving south. Conversely, when the climate warms up in the northern hemisphere, it rains less in the southern hemisphere.' Now compare that to what is happening now. What drove the warming during the MCA and the cold during the LIA? Are those same things happening now? Why is the warming now global? To say that because some change in our climate happened a millennium ago and therefore anthropogenic climate change is not happening now without ANY attribution is crap. Oh, I feel honored that you have given me some of your time.

Here, I'll give you some of my time: https://www.swsc-journal.org/articles/swsc/full_html/2017/01/swsc170014/swsc170014.html

notmev so are you saying that the LIA and the Medieval Warm Period happened? If you are that means you don't believe in Michael Mann's Hockey stick. That blows apart the whole idea of CO2 driving climate change.

Hey Billy Boy!!. Can you please point out exactly what is wrong with the hockey stick!!?... 🤔

.666" Dick, the problem with the hockey schtick is that yes temps have gone up since the end of the Little Ice Age, but to make that look bad Mann got rid of the warmth of the Medieval Warm Period and the cold of the Little Ice Age. Another problem with the hockey stick is that Michael Mann refuses to show how he made the graph, he even lost a lawsuit to Dr. Tim Ball that cost Mann ~$700,000 Canadian because he would show how he made the graph that has changed the climate debate so much. Not sharing how you did your work is a violation of the scientific method, you show your work and let other scientists try your work to verify it, that has never happened. I know I have asked you before if you believe in the LIA and the MWP and I saw you say that you had answered that question, but I didn't see it, so could you answer it one more time please. https://i1.wp.com/principia-scientific.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/graphs.jpg?resize=550%2C398

On a technicality, yeh bravo!!. Doesn't mean that the graph is wrong!... Your explanation of the scientific method is definitely something Tony doesn't do!!! 🤔... I'm sick of repeating myself with people like you & Tony. You just stick with beliefs & your graphs that were drawn up with a crayons 👍

That was a waste of 1:25. When did record keeping begin? After the world wide cooling of the Little Ice Age. Wow! We warmed up slightly.

@Billington Try and understand that it is the rate of climate change that is happening that is the problem. Also you keep mentioning "THE LITTLE ICE AGE"! https://skepticalscience.com/akasofu-LIA-recovery.htm https://skepticalscience.com/coming-out-of-little-ice-age.htm Give me some facts that support that we have warmed up slightly, or the LIA was global, or the same physics that got us out of the LIA is causing us to "warm up slightly". You only puke out beliefs. I've not seen you back up any statment of yours wth data, or a substantial.

The little Ice Age was real and global. You can do your own research, I don't want to be accused of cherry picking data. You could start by looking into the new ice core data coming out of the Alps. Very interesting core data, it's not Greenland or Antarctica, places where people and records didn't exist until very recently. This is the area where "Iceman" was discovered. Human records go way back, instrument data has been there for almost as long as there has been thermometers, so you can see the core data with the instrument data, pretty cool. One thing Tony brings up often is that the Arctic was ice free ~6,000 years ago. Here is a line from this Nature article about the Alps: " The glaciological settings and state-of-the-art micro-radiocarbon age constraints indicate that the summit has been glaciated for about 5900 years." And please, don't say things like puke, you are not .666" dick, I think you and I could have a more civil debate. Also, if you look at the Younger Dryas you will see temps went up and down more extreme than anything now. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-77518-9 And something about the Younger Dryas. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_page_width/public/Years-before-present-Younger-Dryas.jpg?itok=eL0wDCg-

@Billington I will try and not use words like "puke" in the future. Sometimes my internal editor is turned off! Thanks for the links, I will read them. Provide as many links to papers that you have. So what if I accuse you of cherry picking. Any one who cherry picks (from both side) should be called out. Climate change is inherently noisy and error bars/probabilities should always be part of the discussion. My bosses would have thrown me out of the nearest window if I ever presented a performance prediction and said that it would have a 100% chance of meeting all the design goals. I think by the time I got the words out that I was joking, I would already have been out the window.

I don't really think cherry picking is a problem. I often ask those who accuse me of cherry picking to show me how they put a puzzle together? I "cherry pick" the pieces with a flat edge (the boarder) and I really want to "cherry Pick" the corners. I'm trying to frame an argument.

Hey Billy Boy!!. I love you too man!!! 🥰. I will always remember those first words you whispered into my ear 💕

CO2 has saturation points, any real chemist can 100% prove climate science is poppycock.

Tony no.2!! 😝... Are you a real chemist!!?... 🤔

Climate radicals? Maybe a more accurate term would be "Climate Bigots"?

I like that term as well

Climate criminals

Both Nat Geo and Sci American have become like The National Enquirer.

Babylon Bee is the only real news out there worth reading.

The BB!

Correct and it's partly because these kids don't seem to question anything, they simply buy what they've been told on CNN or whatever.

Just as questioning the election results or attempting to provide real information about mask-wearing and the "vaccine" have been eliminated so will, eventually, any climate change "deniers".