Originally uploaded to https://www.bitchute.com/video/zxeaHN99vx0K/ by CriticalThinking102 Peter Doshi - Senior Editor of the British Medical Journal "So I found it fascinating to learn that Merriam-Webster changed its definition of vaccine early this year mrna products did not meet the definition of vaccine that has been in place for 15 years at merriam-webster but the definition was expanded such that mrna products are now vaccines i highlight this to ask a question how would you feel about mandating covered vaccines if we didn't call them vaccines what if these injections were called drugs instead so here's the scenario we have this drug and we have evidence that it doesn't prevent infection nor does it stop viral transmission but the drug is understood to reduce your risk of becoming very sick and dying of COVID would you take a dose of this drug every six months or so for possibly the rest of your life if that's what it took for the drug to stay effective would you not just take this drug yourself but support regulations mandating that everybody else around you take this drug or would you say hold on a sec maybe you'd say that if that's all the drug does why not use a normal medicine instead the kind we take when we're sick and want to get better and why would you mandate it the point is just because we call it a vaccine doesn't mean we should assume these new products are just like all other childhood vaccines which get mandated each product is a different product and if people are okay with mandating something simply because it's a vaccine and we mandate other vaccines so why shouldn't we mandate this i think it's time to inject some critical thinking into that conversation"