Sign In  
  Sign Up  
  Popular - Categories
  Popular - All Uploads
  Recent - Categories
  Recent - All Uploads
  Random Upload
  Contact NewTube  
About NewTube  
  Support NewTube
-30  
-15  
-5  
-1  
+1  
+5  
+15  
+30  
1719
268
In 2004, The Guardian said Britain would have a Siberian climate by the year 2020. Time is up for the UK.
File Size: 41 MB
Category: Politics
88 Comments
RnBram
- 4 years ago  
Tony, video-blogger Kate Wand has posted an excellent video on the Totalitarian nature of Environmentalists. She includes several clips of your buddy ;-) Paul Erlich. https://youtu.be/_--llEGIftU
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
Congratulations Joe Biden!! 🎉🎊🎉👍
Efyoutube
- 4 years ago  
Bill gates like soros needs to go. They want most of us dead. Let's start with them.
SeanColeman
- 4 years ago  
it is could here in Ireland too. Can you believe it, but it isnow illegal to build new houses with chimneys, even in teh sountryside (if I got that right). It hinik it is because of the Green party; many gave them a vote in the mistaken belief that they were decent and harmless. In my opinion they are the very worst of a bad bunch.
GordonVigurs
- 4 years ago  
Here is a 'debunk' of the suggestion that no further CO2 greenhouse effect is possible because the atmospheric absorption is aleady nearly 100% at its current level. It comes from that alarmist echo chamber 'skepticalscience', and really reflects the standards we have come to expect of the climate science community. https://skepticalscience.com/saturated-co2-effect.htm Allegedly, adding more carbon dioxide CAN block the outgoing radiation further because the 'radiative height' increases. Notwithstanding the fact that the lower stratosphere is isothermal at 216 K, raising the 'radiative height' makes no difference to the gas temperature. any suggestion that the outgoing irradiance from the planet is different from the incoming irradiance cannot describe equilibrium conditions, Whatever the new equilibrium condition the planet as a whole must remain in radiative equilibrium, a condition which would not be possible, if this debunk were true. There are two fundamental errors; the first is the nonsensical idea of a single 'radiative height' (at a nominal 254K temperature level). This comes about by a failure to include the fourth root of one half term in the stratosphere radiation balance equation. The second is the clear confusion of power with energy, which is ubiquitous in the climate science literature. If you ever doubted that climate science only attracts the Z List of physicists, read some articles on that site. Most are hilarious. Through the process of 'peer review' it is the monkeys who keep running the climate zoo.
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
So in other words you are saying we can pump as much pollution & CO2 into the atmosphere & nothing will ever happen!!?... 🤔
GordonVigurs
- 4 years ago  
CO2 isn't a pollutant. It has been fifteen times or greater than its current level in the past. The greenhouse effect is on a par with phlogiston theory or canals on Mars, all 'peer reviewed' rubbish
Spongehead
- 4 years ago  
Oh brother I thought we were warming up? They cannot make up their minds on what catastrophe they want to push this year!
mrgriswold
- 4 years ago  
Verified prediction is the gold standard for science. So, for Warmists, that really destroys their claims to being the advocates of science, let alone 'settled science.' Maybe they mean, 'settled seance?'
propagandasceptic
- 4 years ago  
what link to UK energy ?
Snickrologen
- 4 years ago  
https://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/02/05/in-their-own-words-climate-alarmists-debunk-their-science/
trevorgrindz
- 4 years ago  
The Guardian has always been full of shit, then?
Ducamara
- 4 years ago  
Are they dimwits? This is a question that puzzled me for a long time. I mean even if they are power consumed psychopaths, why would gates, Obama Bloomberg macron merkle all profess wisely about so ridiculous a theory if they understood how dumb it is?
trevorgrindz
- 4 years ago  
Because there are stupid people, fanatics really, who will believe anything, even if they have doubt in the hearts. "Blind trust in authority is the greatest enemy of truth" -Albert Einstein
Gilfort the great
- 4 years ago  
What Boris wants is very simple: Get re-elected! Bill? He is a nerd who developed an addiction to fame and stardom.
Nik Monk
- 4 years ago  
Actually, I don’t think Boris does want to get re-elected. He has a lot of children to support and educate (“at least six” as Wikipedia says; Boris has the morals of a tomcat), and he took a huge cut in pay when he left journalism for politics. I think he will resign this year. His main concern is probably his ‘legacy’, a primary focus of narcissists.
Seaside Rock
- 4 years ago  
Siberian and Mediterranean climates in the same day - welcome to the United Kingdom..!
MichaelDomansky
- 4 years ago  
Inverse China Syndrome! 🤣
Zorrozorro
- 4 years ago  
Please get rid of the dark background. Love your content devoted follower but hate,hate the background.
Gilfort the great
- 4 years ago  
+1
William_Brown
- 4 years ago  
I like the black background, less tiring for the eyes.
Conrad
- 4 years ago  
We just woke up to record snowfall in central Oklahoma. New record since 1899! This global warming is sure colder than I expected.
Elvisboy777
- 4 years ago  
LMAO. Happy New Year
Mannalora
- 4 years ago  
I finally figured out how to find you on newtube. Would you consider adding you stuff to Rumble. It would help you reach.
trevorgrindz
- 4 years ago  
I agree!
SirNicholas
- 4 years ago  
+1
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
Anyone remember this trick the little trickster tricked you with!!?... The wolf that pulled the sheepskin over your eyes!! 😝... Human stupidity run's strong in here hey!!! 🤗 https://youtu.be/-QCBDnJU2sQ
BrettonWoods
- 4 years ago  
666 Your insane and ludicrous comments indicate you are a Satan worshiper. The most disgusting and moronic being throughout the whole universe.
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
No, that would be God!! 😝... But thanks, I'll take that as a compliment of one of my many followers 😊
JacobH
- 4 years ago  
6666 Likes Peterpan 🎀.
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
Peter Pan is man!!. Heller is just a story teller 🤗
gwc1954
- 4 years ago  
6666 peter Pan was a woman that identified as a man I'm sure you can relate to that 🤭🤗😝
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
I'm sure you can be identified as a Tony ass locker! 🤗. He doesn't need toilet paper when you're around!! 😝
gwc1954
- 4 years ago  
Oh no 6666 u mad "again" Bro 🤭😝
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
You will certainly will be when he has a bad case or diarrhoea!! 😝... No money is worth doing that job bro!. But hey, everyone to the own 🤷
gwc1954
- 4 years ago  
6666 doesn't know much "Butt" does seem knowledgeable about ass licking...🤭🤗
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
Yeh quite clearly you do!! 🤫
My Brighteon Channel
- 4 years ago  
"Always reliable Guardian" LOL... 😏 May God save us from Joe Biden & Camel...
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
God won't help you out!!... But I might be able to organise something, for you 😃
rathnakumar
- 4 years ago  
Newtube sucks, Tony!
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
You nearly got it right!!... Just, Tony sucks! 😝
gwc1954
- 4 years ago  
The poor UK has been hit from all directions, mass immigration of the undesirable kind and stage 4 socialism but they allowed all of this to happen. Complacence is a very dangerous thing!
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
What is an undesirable kind!!! 🤔
gwc1954
- 4 years ago  
6666 you 😝💋
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
Can't admit that you are just another racist fucker!!? 🤔.... Yep! By calling me 6666 is just more proof!! 😝. Its 666 & you're going to burn! 👺
JacobH
- 4 years ago  
6666
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
& another one bites dust!!
gwc1954
- 4 years ago  
6666 can't u just admit u a daddy 👉👍er
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
Only if you admit you're a Tony fucker!! 😝
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
BTW!! Nice way to change the subject buddy!!! 🤔... 👺
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
Get back to me about his butt fetishes!! But didn't get back to this comment!!? 🤔... Starting to get a picture of my new friend 🤗
GordonVigurs
- 4 years ago  
The inability to abandon a discredited theory is what exposes climate science as mere sophistry, and not genuine science. The more evidence is presented to refute their cherished beliefs, the more aggressively they defend them. Just as the religious fanatic sees the Hand of God in everything that happens, all weather and climate events are perceived as irrefutable 'proof'. Bill Gates is pissing against the wind if he thinks the atmosphere is so unstable to be remotely influenced by his pathetic efforts. He might get a transient local effect, but an atmosphere which has withstood super volcanoes and asteroid impacts is unlikely to respond globally. Our best hope is that he goes broke in the effort.
YorkieBoy
- 4 years ago  
I think you are correct. I cannot see any other explanation. They have produced a pseudo-science which they believe like a religious script. Further they are unable to see the damage they are doing to our energy supplies, and hence our economy.
mev
- 4 years ago  
"The more evidence is presented to refute their cherished beliefs". But that is not what is being presented other than in blogs, videos, comments,... Climate science is genuine science. peer reviewed, published in reputable journals, ripped apart in journals if poor, reanalyzed again and again by other CLIMATE SCIENTISTS. Not bloggers. Not scientists that have never published a climate paper, not medical doctors. Not fossil fuel funded think tanks.
GordonVigurs
- 4 years ago  
You will not get anything which does not support the standard narrative through the phoney, croney baloney 'peer review'. The 'blogs' which refute the CO2 theory consist of any standard undergraduate text on thermodynamics and an IQ greater than that of a gerbil. Anybody with a degree in a STEM subject can see straight through the sham.
GordonVigurs
- 4 years ago  
Your definition of 'science' is almost a perefect dictionary definition of 'sophistry'. We do not assess ideas on their intrinsic merits, but on who proposes them. Welcome back to the middle ages. This is an infection of the academy, which I fear has become endemic, and could well explain why so little real novelty has emerged over the past thirty years despite a record high population of professors.
mev
- 4 years ago  
@GordonVigurs If you had any experience in graduate studies, scientific research, or anything beyond "standard undergraduate text on thermodynamics" you would see the level of ignorance statement about CO2. Read this: https://skepticalscience.com/Second-law-of-thermodynamics-greenhouse-theory.htm Now using your knowledge of undergraduate thermodynamics, tell me what is being violated? Or how about this one: https://skepticalscience.com/saturated-co2-effect.htm I've purposely did not ask you to read scientific peer reviewed articles, just simplyfied summations.
GordonVigurs
- 4 years ago  
The permise which is refuted in the cited article is utter nonsense. Not only do you resort to ad hominem, you compound your stupidity with straw man argument. If you are serious about removing your blinkers please refute https://gvigurs.wordpress.com/2019/04/28/the-emperors-new-climate/. I admit I was expecting the usual BS 'debunk' of Gerlich and Tscheuschner or Nikolov and Zeller. ANYBODY with a degree in a STEM subject with access to fairly elementary textbooks and a reasonable IQ can refute the CO2 theory. However, the chances of getting it past an editorial board whose reputations were built on the hoax are negligible.
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
Does Tony actually own a cherry farm or what!!? As I'm a little confused after talking to a friend... So yeh, I'm asking for my friend who's friend said his friend of his friend said a friend of his friends wife's husband sister in-laws brothers son said he is just a disgruntled loser that has a personal grudge against the scientific communities of America & the world because he coped a knock back in life because he was just a egotistical narcissistic looser pick towards everyone & anyone who had a different option to what he says thinking he knows everything & that everyone else knows nothing!!? 🤔. Something about that he now lives in some shanky US government funded subsidized apartment too!!? 🤔. I do often wonder why he rides his bike around everywhere!??... Anyway, if anyone can help me out with information so I can pass it onto my friend that would be much appreciated!!. Poor fella if that's the case hey!!!... Much thanks in advance 💕. & Don't forget! You can donate to Tony's channel #here 🤗
GordonVigurs
- 4 years ago  
Delivered with the transparent lucidity which we have come to expect. I think its is called second order ad hominem, typical of those unfamiliar with the tenets of rational thought. I know I shouldn't mock the afflicted, but keep it up, I find your incoherent ravings most amusing.
Bandit6
- 4 years ago  
666.... Let me get this straight and true. You actually believe the conflicting articles, each with there own merits, even though they conflict each other no , mater how many reports there are. So you do not believe the morons when they publish a article 20 years ago, yet you believe a article they publish today? As if the grew some integrity from then until now. Guess you do not understand the basics. It is 99% true that their integrity will decline. It is really so simple, yet you do not seem to be able to grasp it. I really think you need to seek help. Oh by the way..... GET YOUR SHOT YET? Better hurry up and get it, billy bob gates is depending on you.
gwc1954
- 4 years ago  
Mental health is a real issue, get help or jump 😝🤗🤭
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
Just have good hard look at all yourselfs!!!... You are now believing in media!! 🤣😂🤣😂. How ironic hey!! 😝... Fucken dip shit 💕
gwc1954
- 4 years ago  
Awww 6666 you mad bro..🤭🤗🤣
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
Thanks bro!! 🤗
Elvisboy777
- 4 years ago  
Go home. Your Mommy is looking for you.
onemotherpucker
- 4 years ago  
Holy shit, you take the rules for radicals to a whole new level. Alinsky would be proud of you. But you forgot the golden rule, propaganda dont work when everyone knows that's what you are doing. Your very amusing, but not very effective.
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
Exactly that!! ☝️⬆️👆... 🤗
MichaelBaker
- 4 years ago  
Thank you from a freezing mediterranean warm UK. No sun or wind today either.
Lee
- 4 years ago  
"It was in the month of Liverpool, and the city of July The rain was snowing heavily, and the streets were very dry."
Viddyjoe
- 4 years ago  
Thankyou, Mr Heller from a frosty Devon, UK. Happy new year to you and yours.
GordonVigurs
- 4 years ago  
Didn't the BBC's performing monkey, David Attenborough give and environmental address at midnight, just as the country was freezing over? How ironic.
Scientific0
- 4 years ago  
And to think it's been snowing in Chihuahua, Mexico, yet these bastards failed to give the Mexican-Siberian climate any discernable attention. https://mexiconewsdaily.com/news/first-snow-of-the-season-in-chihuahua/
Smoking_Dog
- 4 years ago  
We all (should) know that the climate ALWAYS changes. A few months ago, I was watching, in real time, a forecast for heavy rain bearing down on my city in about an hour. After several refreshes, I saw the impending storm just dissipate quickly. So much for weather predictions.... In my opinion, the weather forcast is generally incorrect, but they claim that their long-term predictions are accurate... REALLY???????
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
We should also know that weather is not climate, environment or even the ecosystems!!!... Smart man hey!!? 😝
Bandit6
- 4 years ago  
666.... Ahhhh.... no. The climate and the weather go hand in hand. In fact the weather makes the climate. The sun controls most of it and it really is quite integrate. And MAN can do nothing to change it. I don't give a fuck what biden told you. Not so smart man hey !!?
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
No it seems you are not!! 😝 😊
AmericanGrl
- 4 years ago  
EXCELLENT TONY!!!
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
Hey skanky!! 😝... Sorry I should ask if you don't mind me calling you that!!?... Hey, I don't mind if you keep calling me punk!!
Bandit6
- 4 years ago  
666... Yet you are a punk. You suck it when your master wants and you bend over when your master wants. I call that a punk.....
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
Like I said I don't mind the name!!. You fantasies though!! 😳. Now that a shame! 😝... 🤔
bgrosz
- 4 years ago  
I think we have the answer to the Fermi paradox. Every "advanced" alien civilization gets to their year of 2020 and their version of leftists take over and the civilization destroys itself.
AmericanGrl
- 4 years ago  
OK, I'm tired but we GOTTA keep fighting! My niece is a really bright girl and has a good college education but she's just this NASTY, Joy Behar style elitist who thinks everyone is so stupid.. I'm moving to get AWAY from all the zombies and it's sad because she's my niece but we HAVE TO FIGHT all of this lunacy!
Manus_Gladii
- 4 years ago  
@AmericanGrl Joy Behar is just nasty, not very bright at all.
Frequent_flyer
- 4 years ago  
😄
TonyHeller666
- 4 years ago  
Keep fighting!! As that's all we can do!!!... Hey shanky! 😝
YorkieBoy
- 4 years ago  
I suspect we will see some decline, especially in the west, but it is nothing new. The human race does not like risk and has created the idea that it can control everything or must have somebody to blame. It amounts to a failure to understand that evidence is required for rational decision making. Instead of evidence, we created gods to blame when things did not work out; we made human sacrifices to appease them. We had priests fiddling about in animal intestines to predict the future. In medieval times we believed in witches who were cooking the weather and we burnt them to solve the problem. There is no record of the weather improving as a result. In Victorian time seances were all the range to contact the dead and still we have clairvoyants. This is all evidence of our continual stupidy. We have now reached a new level of educated imbecility. We have more knowledge than at any other time in our history and rather than use it to gain understanding we adapt it to agree with our ridiculous belief that we can control everything. As a result we now have advanced from fiddling about with entrails and replaced it with meaningless mathematical models, which have been coded to prove that we can control the climate. The same as be done with modelling to prove that we can control a virus.
Pdinan
- 4 years ago  
Hilarious Tony.